This is wrong in so many ways. You should do a better job of living up to your name.

I have it on good authority that putting vaccines too close together CAN melt steel beams.

Woof. I’ll bite.

As for climate change, many of them want to use sources of cleaner energy like Nuclear power

1) There is a federal law banning the use of government funds from use in abortion. Cutting money to PP will not stop abortions, it will just stop all the other good shit they do. They all know this, its the law, they are just pandering to their audience.

Caroline, if abortion is killing babies, then it would be illegal to support their murder just because their mother was raped.

“...they can’t accurately tell me what the whether will be next week or whether margarine or butter is worse for you. Science is not an absolute and we never have all the answers.”

Where to begin...

Not because of autism concerns, but that getting doses too close together can limit their effectiveness. Science, not witchcraft.

So abortion = killing babies.

“...because they don’t want government money to go into killing babies.”

Tough crowd at the moment. Everything will end up gendered on Jez, which has an upside and a downside. Good piece, tho!

That's how has always interpreted that term.

I don’t think that’s the tone at all.

This is a scientific study which is an analysis of statistical data. It says what it says. It’s not a therapist who can sanction certain actions and predict outcomes. I don’t think the article was saying “You should do this, but avoid this to have a relationship” it was just communicating the conclusion of a study.

Your write up was fine and absolutely clear. The headline was a little misleading but anyone reading the article would have it clarified. I have no idea what everyone is freaking out about MRA’s for since the outcome of this study was pretty unambiguous.

fixed that for you. I’ve dated my friends since ever. Way nicer than cold-approaching someone, and you know whether or not your basics mesh even before you start the relationship.

I don’t think it does, though. The study is looking at a legitimate phenomenon (assortive mating) and how knowing your SO for longer before dating impacts that. This is subconscious. It's not about faking friendship to get manipulate someone into something else, and it's not limited to one gender.

The fact that cats are objectively inferior to dogs remains the most convincing argument.

You science so good.