Frankly, I think the dichotomy is wrong, or at least outdated. Is cognitive development a hard science or a humanity? How about urban planning? You need scientific rigor to approach any serious humanistic endeavor, because everything requires research. On the other hand, "hard science" without an understanding of it's…

You don't. The whole point of feminism is choice - that being pacifist or violent or badass or forgiving is a choice we make, everyone of us, and not thing prescribed to us by our sex/gender. Like, women can be cutthroat CEOs or NAVY seals, if they want, just like men can be nurses or counselors. That is why feminist…

No offense, but I think your prejudice is showing. As as student of Landscape Architecture and Urban Design, I was exposed to shit-tons of writing in both hard scientific ("Determining Drainage Capacity through Suborbital Surface Analysis"), humanities ("Cultural Hegemony and the Weakening of the Other: Community…

I would write that sentence "However, feminist science fiction has always existed beyond the bindings of books." That being said, I can see why you'd arrange the focus the way they did, if you cared more about precision of impression rather than ease of understanding.

Oooh, I'd love to hear the answers. I feel like a lot of the most interesting writers in SF today are women — Margaret Atwood springs immediately to mind, for instance.

What phrases are you having trouble with? One thing I noticed when I started getting into denser and more academic writing was that I had to slow down considerably from my normal reading speed in order to comprehend everything.

They're Harmon Kardon, and sound great for $150 speakers. Take that for what you will.

Hey, that's the State Sen. from my town! LOGAN RULES! Even tho we elected this dweeb (I didn't vote for him, lord).

There's a whole circle of Mormon feminist blogs that would beg to differ.

All I heard was "Guys Rock!" and then a whole lotta blah blah woman talk. Bro out, bro. Steak and boobs!

Are you seriously saying that racism and calling-things-racist are equivalent wrongs? I don't think you're evil, I just think you have had a very limited experience of the world and you could a little more compassion. Isn't it enough that using these words dehumanizes and hurts people? What about saying "nigger" is so…

Listen, the word "faggot" is offensive because I had my face beaten into the concrete while a bunch of people who look just like you screamed it at me. One of my best friends in high school cut herself open because she couldn't take the bullying anymore. To you, these are just words. Racsim? Sexism?Concepts,…

We've lost Gizmodo. The comments today, on this and on the github article, have convinced me. I've been commenting on this site for four years, and I just feel like it's over. The neckbeards and trolls have won.

You're seriously trying to talk sense to someone calling for the mass-extermination of a billion people?

Someone was offended by the casual use of the word nigger and faggot so you want to you want to drag them behind your truck and bury them? You might want to stop and reflect about the person you are becoming.

Eh, I've had some sex that left me exhausted and was definitely equal to any other intense hour-or-so workout. But yeah, most sex, not really gonna work off the second plate of nachos.

The word fuck isn't tied to and glorifying hundreds of years of violence and oppression. It isn't used to dehumanize people or justify hurting them. No one gets dragged behind a truck and dumped in the woods for being a "fucker"

What are all these niggers and faggots doing reading our code anyway? - Gizmodo

I take it you have never been a male. Blue balls are completely real. Now, using that to try to force someone to have sex with you? Obviously bullshit. But the fact that your balls hurt like shit after being aroused for a long time and not coming? Unfortunately real.

But isn't all of that hardware made in China or Taiwan? What's wrong with Mexico, then? I'm just trying to figure out where you're coming from.