While it is not a unusual behaviour after it is also not a unusual behavior prior and during and that means he had consent.

If positive and encouraging attitudes right after continuing for sometimes years after is not unusual then the same behaviors prior and during are also not unusual.

In doing that and saying that to them you do know that you were giving consent on those occasions right?

The fact that being accused of rape is nowadays enough to have the public see you as guilty is likely the reason he wanted a judge who is trained to look at the evidence without emotional bias..

One thing nobody has touched on is the fact that if it is far from unusual behavior for victims to have positive attitudes right after and for years after it is also true that they had those same attitudes prior and during.

The same reasoning can be said about liars.

While all that maybe true something else is true.