Me too movement created by Tarana Burke: 2006.
Me too movement created by Tarana Burke: 2006.
I think he’s very cute, but I don’t run to see many of his movies for whatever reason. And I don’t remember him being in The Social Network. Then again, that movie feels like several Great Dyings ago.
The book this is based on is fairly insufferable and kinda gross. It’s hard to not read the story as a man grooming a woman through time travel. The book wants you to think of them as true loves forced to live a hard life because of the mans rare genetic disease of “time travel” but it’s also about a dude who meets…
Ugh, we need a delete comment button.
Sigh. They. This article is literally about them being a they.
Man my friend told me this earlier and I could have SWORN this already happened like a year or two ago :S idk if I got them confused with someone else or I got them coming out as pan confused with coming out as non-binary, or what lmao but it was a weird Berenstain/Berenstein bears kinda moment
My Best Friends Wedding is a masterpiece if only for Ruppert Everett having the time of his life being the most charming guy ever in that movie.
Yeah it’s a real shame they don’t make cinematic masterpieces like “I Love Trouble,” “America’s Sweethearts,” and “Something to Talk About” anymore.
“Runaway Bride” is garbage, too. Fight me.
I just can’t imagine trying to dramatize my own life; that’s a special kind of confidence.
Sonic’s NOT big in the UK? Huh, I guess my views are skewed when 90% of my exposure to Sonic media is from a Twitter account that sometimes talks about the UK Sonic comic.
Just as one often sees a movie for multiple reasons, the number of reasons to *not* see this one keep piling up. The last one was really bad; the writer is an a-hole; do I really want to risk catching COVID to see this? It’s just a question of which of the list of reasons is your top one; YMMV in that respect.
Yeah, like, it sucks that she's transphobic, but I honestly doubt that that's affecting the movie's business that much. It's definitely more of a "these movies blow" problem.
You know normally I wouldn’t respond to something like this, I mean this is such bad-faith arguing that what you respond? However, in this case, I could not help myself as I couldn’t stop laughing at this. Like this is legitimately one of the most hilarious things responses I’ve gotten in ages and there have been some…
why-not-both.gif
It’s almost as if Crimes of Grindelwald was a sequel of a film that was the best received of these three and had some momentum, or hope that the films might turn around quality-wise.
It’s shocking that a four years later sequel to a movie nobody liked is tanking
It is also a sequal of a film that was considered deeply underwhelming to say the least. So why exactly would the audience that didn’t like the preceding film be excited to see the sequel?
I love how people are painting this as a result of JK Rowling’s rants and the Johnny Depp/Amber Heard fight when even the first one, done before all of this became high-profile talking points, was largely met with a resounding “Eh, it exists, I guess” reaction.
I can’t believe she would admit something like that in public.
If I recall correctly, he was made governor of whatever Spanish district in the Caribbean and pretty much worked the native population to death. Literally.