I think the difference is that your family didn’t kill feral cats for sport and gloat about it.

NOT Russia. No no no. Nothing good to be had there, male-wise.

I worked with a male colleague who subscribed to some flavor of Moronism under which he could not be alone in a room with a woman, even if it was work-related. I can’t believe those of us that worked around him had to cater to that shit. One time he grudgingly agreed to give me a ride in his car because otherwise I…

I quote the Most Reasonable Mother On Earth, Amy Poehler: “Good for her! Not for me. That is the motto women should constantly repeat over and over again.”

"Almost all the blacks in his book are victims, almost all the whites villains. This is not history; it is advocacy."

I called this back in January when Savannah gave an awkward response to the question of why she wasn't skydiving with Gabby Giffords. See video.

Also, in most heterosexual couples, sex is always defined as p-in-v. In my experience the male partner always feels somewhat entitled to p-in-v. But there are so many more ways to have sex. If we could broaden our definition of what sex is, I bet people would be doing a lot more of it and feeling less unsatisfied.

But does Claire really have motivations outside of helping Francis' career? She used to— she used to have that water thing. But she dropped that like a hot potato. This season she somewhat seredipitously took up the issue of the sexual assault bill, but then caved on that, too. I don't really think she's a…

Man discovers that no women want to bang Russian guys. Seriously, Russian guys, catch the eff up. Russian women are generally supermodel nuclear physicists, whereas you guys are generally violent, alcoholic whiners. The numerical advantage you enjoyed after WWII is over. I say this as an American woman who spends…

Right? Russian yogurt is delicious!! Also, often free of preservatives and very fresh.

And that, folks, is how adults speak to each other! Bravo!!! Each of you.

Indeed, the only thing keeping us from paying everyone a market wage is moral. I believe in that moral. So if you're still going to have capitalism and also have that moral, you have to have government intervention. Now, you can intervene by having the govt. make up the difference between actual wage and living…

Ok, yes, I agree that society has a duty to each of its members. It's nice that we have a constant from which to start.

No, I mean that helping the poor subsidizes businesses that pay their workers at a low rate. Why does making up the difference between what a business pays and what a person needs fall to all of us? Why does it not fall to the businesses themselves? By having the government make up the difference, we are allowing…

yeah, but when the government makes up the other 65% of the person's wage, the *benefit* of that goes to the private, for-profit business, regardless of whether or not a particular taxpayer patronizes that business. The more appropriate question is, why should the government be subsidizing a private industry like…

Or, instead of giving a giant public subsidy to a corporation and its shareholders, what if you take out profit entirely and have the business owned and operated by the government? My point is that your version of capitalism requires government intervention to keep people from starving. The public pays that money…

Indeed. Why is it that Republicans always blame pregnancy on women? By my understanding of the procedure, a *man* has to ejaculate in order for a woman to get pregnant. How are unwanted pregnancies not their fault?

THIS.