canyouguess
canyouguess
canyouguess

I choose to be less cynical. Americans love to read about anything royal adjacent so its no surprise they are constantly on the front cover. They said their piece on Oprah. Now its just the media making stuff up to keep the narrative going.... cause it sells magazines. They are still exploiting Princess Diana on a

Agreed. There is absolutely nothing in any of the articles which is a ‘news’ item. Just re-hashing stuff that already happened and the rest is conjecture. I think those two are pretty busy enough without planning how to plant items in internet news and gossip feeds. 

I don’t know but asking if they have picked a name yet or not seems like something that anyone would ask and answer. I believe the part about making sure the royals are on board with name choice - but that’s a quote from a couple of years ago. The People article is the same. Just a bunch of conjecture about the

So you think ‘sources’ and ‘well connected royal insider’ are Prince Harry and spouse? 

Which is clearly something we could all do without.

What do they do again?

Persuasion may take many forms. Interestingly (and horrifyingly) many nurses and other hospital personnel (not doctors) are apparently resisting getting vaccinated. One hospital in Toronto has mandated that everyone who has not been vaccinated must attend a video presentation as to why it is scientifically necessary

I think you are correct. Reduce the lives of the unvaccinated until it is not tolerable. Any private business including bars and restaurants and retail outlets should prevent entry. All public positions including government and the military should be denied to them for employment. No passport. No medical care. In case

Feels like Kylie has crossed over that wave line to porn posing. Why Kylie?

Never a fan of de Niro but I wonder if a few brain cells have died in the recent past. I have seen and heard him interviewed here and there and he comes off as confused and often inarticulate. I’m not saying dementia but ....mmm

I am also confused by this. Why would she choose to speak in these terms before the verdict was returned. I know there is a lot of political theatre going on here but this doesn’t seem like a smart play.

This succinctly answers my original query of ‘who the hell would buy, let alone read this shit’. And now I know.

Lack of vaccine - the procurement (federal govt) was poor. We had to get Pfizer from Europe - some of the promised shipment from there was diverted to other European countries. Canada is unable to manufacture its own vaccine so relies on mostly European sources  for procurement. The US gave us some of their astrazenca

When we are still talking about granda’s funeral we know that we have clearly run out of things to talk about

So what do you think should happen?

Pure? What an interesting word to use. My opinion is that the community is going to try this officer in the court of public opinion, render a verdict of guilty and ask for her head on a pike. This is not the Chauvin case. But because of the Chauvin case, she will be given no benefit of the doubt. Those in charge are

So it was the police officers intention to ‘execute’ this man? Is that what you are saying. 

Would third degree apply here do you think. Do you believe this cop was acting with depraved indifference. In the Chauvin case it makes sense. I don’t see it here though.

anyone paying even minimal attention knows Wright was pulled over for expired tags, and that the cops tried to arrest him on a misdemeanour warrant.

Its going to make a huge difference for the officer isn’t it. She could be charged with manslaughter or murder. Quite significant. Since when does a misdemeanor equal an arrest warrant?