Do you mean to imply that the US’s near peer competitors will be willing to go to war to help Iran?  that’s the analogy you’re attempting to draw?  Since you seem so knowledgeable, perhaps you can explain what Russia or China have to gain from an all out war with the US and how either nation intends to get their…

As the world’s hegemon, the US would probably wreck the Iranian Navy, destroy Kharg Island, probably neutralize Iranian military assets outside the Iranian border, and speed up the strangulation of the Iranian economy.

What scenario exactly do you envision that results in a WW2 style land war with “tens of thousands” of American casualties?  I get the hero worship of anyone opposing the US, but Iran isn’t a serious opponent unless the US decides to invade and occupy.  There’s pretty much zero chance of that happening when we could…

We could already be powering all of New England with offshore wind by the liberal NIMBY types who live on the coast wont allow it.  I’m looking at you John Kerry.  In summary, I’ll start acting like it’s a crisis when the people who are telling me it’s a crisis start acting like it’s a crisis.

Child blogger writes about child activist cosplayers, news at 11

It sure is a strange turn of events to see liberals celebrating the victory of religion over science.  

Just 10 trillion?  Where’s her spirit?  As long as we’re in agreement that none of her plans will see the light of day, she should really shoot for the moon and ask for eleventy tragilliomb dollarbs so each human can have their own solar system fueled solely by Lizzy’s smug sense of self satisfaction

Also, most big nations aren’t going to commit economic suicide for some really really small island nations.  You can be as mad about that as you like but it’s simply never going to happen. 

It would be best if the environmental movement would stop with the kabuki dance and simply state it’s beliefs and desires, namely that the first world (especially that awful cishet America) should lower it’s standard of living and apologize 5x a day towards mecca or anywhere in the 3rd world that feels appropriate

Yeah this blog post reads like a bunch of apologia for Erdogan. Do you hate Trump so much that you’ve become shills for a 3rd world despot and deny the Armenian Genocide?  I mean I always assume you’re a shitty person, but this seals it

The EU in general and Germany specifically are already choking out their ability to compete globally because of artificially high energy costs. This is another nail in that coffin.  I wonder how long they can keep the ponzi scheme up with all those unskilled refugees pouring in demanding full welfare state benefits.

Wow, a tiger sure can change it’s stripes!

It sure is shocking, all this extreme weather, we’ve never had that before

You had kids?  You realize that’s a blasphemous hate crime among the alarmists, dont you?  At any rate, chances are you’re a much better steward of the planet than you parents, who probably drove V8 sedans with leaded gas and little in the way of emissions control, and used electricity generated mostly if not…

When the only policy prescriptions that alarmists have consist of making the West (or First World, if you prefer) revert to a stone age existence, while the ‘developing’ world (China) get to do whatever they like, yes, people aren’t going to listen to you.  Scratch a climate alarmist, find the same crusted over angry…

Poor people will feel a disproportionate effect of Global Warming, like they have for every single event since ever

Actually, my concerns are wholly practical. Justice and equity are important parts of getting buy-in for binding international agreements. China isn’t going to sign shit unless we are offering substantial reductions of our own, and a per capita framework is exactly what they point to as necessary.

Spending $800k per housing unit because of ‘climate change’ is Peak Liberal. Maybe give each family a $200k grant to move inland instead, or, get educated and improve their lives, rather than keeping them in a Democratic prison.

Counterpoint: probably not, unless you’re living on a low lying coastal plain in a 3rd world country. Which I expect you’re not. With all the panic in the air you would think that we’re already in the IPCC’s worst case scenario, where we convert to a 100% coal economy rather than going in the other direction.  I guess…

Total emissions are far more important than per capita if you’re trying to reduce total CO2.  If you’re trying to virtue signal about how great the chicoms are and how much you hate America, then yeah, let ye lead the way by reducing your carbon footprint to zero. You can do that today, right now, and it would allow…