Disagree. That’s a stately, unique, simply-sweet rear end.
Disagree. That’s a stately, unique, simply-sweet rear end.
“Hood gap as intentional design feature?”
Meanwhile those look faded, old and bland.
Not only did you bite, your take is wrong. Your brain doesn’t have to process as much with an analog gauge. You don’t have to read the clock at all. You can process from your periphery that the minute hand isn’t yet vertical. It’s the same reason that an analog speedometer is better than a digital one. You only have…
You sound fun.
It shouldn’t be the only time display in the car. My land rover’s got a digital clock in the top-right of its info display, and a round analog clock below. Which I love. Reasons:
Roll back the clock 50 years, and think which perspectives would be getting pounded into silence.
Clocks with moving parts are for losers. I use my compass to orient my car in just the right position for my dashboard-mounted sundial to work accurately.
You’ve got to remember when dealing with these centrist hot take addicts: they do not believe that protest, one of the litmus tests of a truly free society, counts as free speech. When it’s some autocratic thug in a third world country sending in the army to crush protesters’ heads, they might occasionally tut. When…
You seem upset. Do you need to tock about it?
I remember people complaining that they couldn’t tell time from an analog clock...
I was just thinking about car colors on the road this morning. It ranged from “I’m sorry for being red” to “This thimble of blue pigment needs to last the entire production run” The only cars I saw that were “colors” were the two Prius Cs that were green and orange.
British Smiling White
And there was much rejoicing.
I know you are. That’s the problem. You think Nazis should have the right to hold Nazi rallies and spread Nazi speech. They shouldn’t. It’s actually bad for Nazis to hold Nazi rallies and spread Nazi speech, as Nazi rallies and Nazi speech are bad. Literally the only country in the world which has a blanket protection…
Defending the right of Nazis to hold Nazi rallies and spread Nazi speech is something Nazis agree with. Doing so is siding with Nazis, and doing so to Nazis’ benefit. Get it through your skull.
I live in a country which, until very recently, had blasphemy laws which went unused and it was perfectly fine. I also live in a country which has hate speech laws and it is better for it. Free speech absolutism is absurd.
If it means defending something you (claim to) view as “mind-numbingly stupid, insulting, or flat our [sic] wrong”, then maybe, just maybe, “defending the unabridged freedom of speech” is bad! Maybe you can choose to decide that not all speech is worth defending. Maybe you can think for just a second and come to the…
Free speech is protection from government intrusion on what you say; that’s exactly why Spencer was allowed to speak at MSU.
Advocating for genocide isn’t free speech, it is hate speech, and it is not protected by the 1st amendment