You appear to be under the impression that the average American voter is rational and informed. They are not. Facts aren’t going to sway voters. Polls don’t measure facts, they measure feelings. Voters vote based on how they feel about candidates and very few people feel good about voting for Hillary.

His inability to win swing states (ie: moderates and independents) is hurting him. His supporters will be there no matter what, that’s true of both sides, but his ability to not lose the moderate-conservative vote will be essential if he wants anything more than a prayer of winning (which I don’t think he does tbh)

I’m just saying that I don’t think your point (while backed up by public polling) disproves the thesis of the article because there is no way a reasonable person can argue a position that he is more truthful with the things he actually says coupled with the lack of transparency on finances, policies, health, and why…

1. As a junior Senator from New York. I don’t forgive her for this, but I use that context to better understand it.

I get your personal reasons, but overall Bill IS likable, according to the polls. His numbers are consistently positive. If he was running he’d win this thing in a Reagan style blowout. So why the difference?

With that kind of logic...let’s be honest...you were already voting for Trump.

He has nothing to recover from, because his supporters faith DOES NOT WAIVER.

[Citation needed].

1) Can be applied to many other candidates, especially Bush post Iraq.

Easy, she is self serving person who will say anything and pander to anyone and step on anyone to get elected. Having said that she is far more intellgent than the talking sweet potato.

I don’t think those criticisms apply as much to Obama, or even Bush (who was genuine in his idiocy). Hillary and Romney both exhibit out of touch moments, but Romney was running as a Republican where that shit is pretty much expected. Also, she’s a powerful woman gunning to become the most powerful person in the…

I’d like you to expand on that a bit. I would agree if you are calling her a terrible campaigner.

I’m in Florida. Unfortunately, we both have to consider the fact that we’re in battleground states that actually could decide this thing.

There’s a 0% this fucknugget is coming out in front of Clinton on a national stage acting calm or professional. He’s going to start spouting a bunch of bullshit while assuming no one will call him on it in real time. His whole shtick is built on the fact that no one cares if he’s lying so long as they don’t catch him…

What I don’t understand is when pundits claim she’s not qualified. I mean, has there ever been a candidate that is more qualified than her? People may choose to not like her for whatever reason, but to claim she’s not qualified is pretty much a lie.

Why? She hasn’t done anything that would remotely put her in the same class as Donald Trump.

Hillary will respond to a moderator question with insight and knowledge gleaned from decades in the limelight, displaying a mastery of the topic and recognition of its nuances that prevent a buzzwordy solution.

I can tell I spent too much time on 4chan (two weeks) back in 2010 because I fully expected that last guy to fly in to the World Trade Center.

What incredible wizadry! I was unaware Notre Dame could actually gain yardage.

Wow. And they didn’t even have to hit 88 miles per hour.