So now they'll know to fly it in from the west at nap-of-the-earth. Grats!

If it's not crazy expensive, it's likely imitation shark fin made from noodles: [en.wikipedia.org]

Huh... "Vaginas the size of Montana" does sound a lot more menacing.

The problem is when you want to leave Not Google+. It's really difficult to delete your account unless you're going to testify against a mob boss and you're given a new account by witness protection...

Gonna have to agree here. The first playthroughs are a cakewalk, but not thinking about your build and gear past the second playthrough is certain death in either game.

There was... one noticeable tilt-shift of famous intersection at Shibuya (the one with a ton of crosswalks). Everything else just seemed like playing with depth-of-field to my untrained eye. Was there anything else?

As has Japan. Some laptops sold in Japan even have a built-in NFC reader so you can slap your phone on your laptop to complete purchases.

All I could think of while I was watching was "Holy that must take all kinds of balls of the size of Montana what the f..."

*insert ICP meme here*

Better buy a telescope. Wanna see me? Buy a telescope. Gonna be in space. Spaaaaaaaaaaaaace! (is awesome)

Actually, a big selling point of the waterproofing is being able to use it in the bathtub — bathing, mind you, not showering. Many Japanese people enjoy taking long baths as a way to relax at the end of the day, and being able to tap away while sitting in the bathtub is a definite boon.

I never asked for this...

itt everyone gets trolled.

"I can't use ShootMe because, obviously, I can't shake this 4-foot-tall phone."

Isn't it more specifically concerning a Moto x Google relaunch of Google TV that has been speculated about recently? The tweet itself does sound anachronistic, though.

And this costs $1.

Getting dumbed down to one Home button will take a lot of getting used to. A physical Home button is a plus, but your Xperia already has that.

It can't possibly be a coincidence.

Is that a tricorder in the article's photo? What is it?