<I don’t think F1 can call itself a sport in the 21st century if drivers can still easily buy their way into the world championship.>

DRS where only the overtaking car has it is dumb. The idea was gimmicky to start, but if it was to be used by the drivers at their discretion (essentially legalize one type of movable aero), the. I would be ok with it. With the rules about it where/who can use it, it ruined any chance for success. 

Nope.  The lapped cars should have been allowed to pass earlier, they never should have shown the “lapped cars not allowed to overtake” message at all.  We’d end up with the same end result, but nobody would be able to argue that anything was unfair, just bad luck that hit Mercedes at the worst time.

>>>the lapped cars should have remained in between the two

And, let’s be honest, the only reason Max wasn’t still ahead in the points is because Hamilton put him in the wall at Silverstone...a week after Wolff said Hamilton was “one Max DNF from title fight”...and then Bottas played billiards the following week pushing Max off track...and that tire failure in Azerbaigan.…

It’s an option, sure, but not as good as the RF, IMO, for a couple of reasons:

I don’t know anything about football, but I assumed that happens all the time?

I figured it would be red flagged since it was so close to the end of the race. Finishing under yellow would’ve sucked but it wouldn’t have been any worse than whatever the fuck Belgium was.

I’m fine with how it finished (that said, I’m biased as I was cheering for Max). There were multiple “good” options, though.

DRS helped, in my opinion. Prior to that, the aero had become so twitchy that passing didn’t happen.

I’m genuinely curious to hear what most peoples’ suggested alternative would have been.

“Neither title contender deserved to lose this year’s championship, especially not in an unforeseen manner like this.

If you think F1 is no longer a sport because of questionable officiating decisions, I'm afraid you don't watch many sports.

What an eloquent response from the fuckwit demanding corporations have complete ability to spy on every aspect of an employee’s life which definitely wouldn’t be used to sack employees who champion social causes or police women and their bodies.

we were tipped off to this last night and had been following the story ever since, talking with our legal team and the sources responsible for breaking the news. something like this is complicated to report so it’s not always easy getting something up first but there might be more on this in the near future...

Outlets were probably a little hesitant as many of these online groups that expose predators have poor track records.

Do you know how things work in life? Unless he has a record, none of this is old news, this is new news.

I’m always slightly worried with these vigilante groups; who knows if what they say can be believed, but you could make the same point with cops most of the time anyway.

What exactly do you think “vetting” means? It wouldn’t have caught something like this. 

Umm, why exactly would you use a story about how a games executive being outed as an alleged paedophile which is in no way connected to his job or the industry as a linking point for the completely separate issue of toxic and potentially criminal actions within industry companies and whether or not Geoff Keighley at…