I know you get very SJWy at times, but slevin is right here from a criminal procedure background. If there was any doubt, the proper method is to restrain and then determine. THAT’S one of the things that make so many of the shooting cases do fucked up- there are many other steps to de-escalate/stop a situation before…

Bullshit. The police have to keep everyone there and figure out what happened. He wasn’t charged, wasn’t even taken away from the scene. This is how it’s supposed to work. He’s a hero and the cops did a good job too.

But he wasn’t irrationally cuffed. You’re getting to judge the situation after the fact and with a whole lot of info and a video. The cops that show up have little info to go off of when they get a call. They don’t know who did what, said what or in what order it all happened in. Given the confined space and lack of…

Why are you all so desperate to hear her say, explicitly, “I do not believe wifi is bad for children?”

Just because hes black doesn’t mean it cant be racist.

Are you assuming that everyone who does so will choose the same candidate as you? “The countries best interest” is a subjective. I don’t think it’s in the country’s best interest to get involved in Syria. Hillary does. I don’t think it’s in the country’s best interest to continue with private health insurance. Hillary…

Enh, it’s not as if he just walked into her plane. She knew he was asking to come and visit. She could, and should, have said that such a meeting was inappropriate at that time and declined his visit. It’s her job to avoid even the appearance of impropriety. And she did not do that.

Nearly perfect would be getting everything right except for a house of representatives primary in a close swing state within the margin of error. Completely whiffing on a presidential candidate is not nearly ‘perfect’ in any sense of the word.

They’re not asking him to withhold updates.

That’s not true. He predicted Donald Trump would lose the primary...more than once.

Do you always trust claims made by the United States government and unnamed analysts that have no evidence attached to them?

They’re a non-issue to you maybe, but for the majority of the country they are an issue that directly relates to her credibility.

Russia has literally nothing to do with this, no matter how much Howard Dean thinks that Comey, an Obama appointee, is working for Putin.

Let’s not forget that your *everyone* here is asking for the withholding of updates on a criminal investigation. Might just as well conspirasize the Democratic leadership doesn’t want these updates released.

Having an impromptu meeting with a high-ranking official involved in an investigation involving your spouse is inappropriate, even if that official is your friend. Look, I don’t think anything bad went down and I agree that Clinton was a great president. But it was a moment of poor judgment that gives fuel to those…

I have to think the AG having a private meeting with the spouse of someone under investigation is breaking some kind of tradition.

People don’t need an excuse not to vote for someone, and candidates aren’t owed any votes. They need to earn them.

Loretta Lynch doesn’t have much credibility in objecting as her shady meeting with Bill Clinton during the e-mail investigation played a role in Comey’s decision to go public. I can only hope Americans are smart enough to realize that this is not a big deal but I fear otherwise.

So either there’s a longstanding tradition or there’s a policy. They’re not the same. One is a matter of mutual respect and the other is codified as part of standard operations. Which is it?

Most HOAs don’t have the capacity by law to ban modifications such as this.