bzzysznher
BzZySznher
bzzysznher

NANCY PELOSI: I’m reminded of my own grandson. He is Irish, English, whatever, whatever, and Italian-American, he is a mix. But he looks more the other [Italian] side of the family, shall we say.

What an absolute fucking lunatic you are. First you claim that it is now confirmed that Russia changed votes during the election, to support your evidence you give us a link to an msnbc news article, where NOWHERE DOES IT SAY RUSSIA HAS BEEN PROVEN TO CHANGE VOTES.

But that didn’t stop you from regurgitating it all

I take the SBS daily and no the driver doesn’t check but at least once a week, MTA enforcement will hop on the bus to check tickets.

I feel like these knee jerk reactions are not rooted in one’s actual “disgust” for the ads themselves, but more of an unconscious way to distance oneself from Companies (Capitalists!) that have HR and other policies that have zero daylight between their politics and your standard Splinter Progressive.

It’s like you

Yes I understand that, however Gowdy (who read all the FISA applications and made the notes that were used in Nunes’s memo), confirmed this morning that without the Dossier, there would have been no FISA application on Page. Yes I know that they wouldve had to reauthorize surveillance, but with Manafort, Flynn, and

Well for one, Clinton was under the investigation of the FBI during the election, not the GOP. Furthermore it is more than obvious that Clinton broke - 18 US Code 793

Guy’s been on surveillance since 2013. What crime has he committed? What, if anything has he been charged with?

because vast majorities of Americans want to restrict it further than what we are doing now

Were those pics taken on 9W?

“(g)(1) The select committee may disclose publicly any information in its possession after a determination by the select committee that the public interest would be served by such disclosure....

You’re missing a step.
Step 1: is the committee voting to release the documents for viewing of the entire House of reps. This is open for all members of the House to view the document for 7 days.
Step 2: is then the same committee voting for release of the docs to be sent to the president.

That’s a pretty big fucking leap there, buddy. Careful where you land.

I’m not saying the dossier was the only source of information. But I am saying that it was the lynchpin in the process of obtaining a FISA warrant, which was confirmed by McCabe and the reason why Wray pressured him to resign. Guess we’ll see.

haha right, right. Why would the Comittee vote for the release of Schiff’s memo when as of Monday no one read his rebuttal? You do understand that Nunes’s memo went through a process where the committee first voted to release Nunes’s memo to the House, anyone in the House could have read his report. This lasted for 7

But without the Dossier no warrant would have been sought. Seems like a pretty big piece of the puzzle no?

OK, so we’re just under the assumption that nothing in this memo is true, that we must verify it with the underlying facts in order to validate it.
And the only thing I copy and pasted was your quotes. Checkmate, I guess?

McCabe states the INFORMATION that was used was also in the dossier. Was the dossier the sole source of the information? Had it been corroborated?

“McCabe testified before the Committee in December 2017 that NO SURVEILLANCE WARRANT WOULD HAVE BEEN SOUGHT FROM THE FISC WITHOUT THE STEELE DOSSIER INFORMATION”

ie: they didn’t go with the pee tape, because that hasn’t been substantiated, but they did use other claims from the dossier that have since been verified by multiple agencies).