You’re allowed to have property in a Marxist society, ya dingus.
You’re allowed to have property in a Marxist society, ya dingus.
rrrrrriiighhhhttttt but certain property wouldn’t be under private ownership we all know that.
Again, why should non-Marxists tolerate your existence if you’re doing undermining everything that this country stands for?
It’s funny that so many Marxists who champion the “Paradox of Tolerance” dont seem to understand that in order for their Utopia to become prominent they would have to take away property rights, which are human rights.
So why should non Marxists tolerate your existence?
Weird, you think after genociding all the white oppressors 200 fucking years ago, Haiti would be a real life Wakanda.
So what you’re saying is that Trump did not actively collude with the Russian government.
The guy didn’t want to be president, yet he colluded with the Russian government, taking a massive amount of personal risk in order to steal the election.
Does that compute at all to you?
But it does seem like a missed opportunity to replace such a heinous symbol of the toxicity that plagues every industry with a woman and/or a person of color.
“It’s a myth!!!!”
*First comment on post is about not tipping*
Me thinks the lady doth protest too much. Stereotypes exist for a reason
Where? In the travel ban case? Where the Supreme Court continued to bitch slap the 9th circuit, because whatever bias the President has in terms of banning classes of people is irrelevant to his powers as President of the United States
it’s audience of clapping seals? Same goes for John Oliver. Clown nose on, clown nose off.
Fraud now equates to “initiative”
lmao.
Sometimes Allen is in his work, but even when he isn’t, his characters are often obvious stand-ins. In a story that takes place wholly in the mind of a man named Moses Rifkin, he writes: “Unlike the Jewish girl — the shiksa is not guilt-ridden — not a complainer — she is abandoned, fun-loving, and above all…
Sometimes Allen is in his work, but even when he isn’t, his characters are often obvious stand-ins. In a story that takes place wholly in the mind of a man named Moses Rifkin, he writes: “Unlike the Jewish girl — the shiksa is not guilt-ridden — not a complainer — she is abandoned, fun-loving, and above all…
All you’re doing is attacking the author and not the merits of the article. You can call him racist until your blue in the face (like these debaters), and yet you still haven’t come up with a counter argument.
Those ad-homs sure taste salty tho.
You mean bad debate styles that went viral showing the full de-evolution of higher education can’t be dragged into a national newspaper as a supporting example?
Whoa, made me think. Better ignore it instead!
Wow that’s a hell of an equivalence to defend the absolute juvenile and incoherent debate structure that is being pushed onto universities today! It’s almost like you’re point has nothing to do with the de-evolution of debate style because it’s “outdated”.
Outdated in what way exactly? Making poignant, coherent points,…
Yeah so weird that this viral debate style and event involving policy prescriptions about Presidential War Powers devolved into how war should not be engaged against niggas along with full music accompaniment by Tupac’s ghost.
But then again the author was using this famous example in order to outline his broader…
I believe the style is to convey as many “arguments” in your allotted time, that’s why they go hyper speed. It’s legitimately about the quantity not the quality of the arguments proposed.