Another problem is that even if he does draft the next great player, that player will be coming into a terrible situation, worse than what Anthony Davis has come into, which would risk said player developing poorly and/or leaving the 76ers ASAP. And if it doesn’t work out you just wasted 3-4 years for a chance at a…

So it doesn’t necessarily have to clear the outfield fence? It could bounce off a player in deep left-center in fair territory and go over the wall in foul territory and it’s a HR? Interesting.

“Non-perfect man that I didn’t totally agree with dies, seems like a great time to tell him to fuck himself.”

So you trolling or never seen the Sandlot?

Did you ever accidentally hit a ball signed by the Babe into Rex’s yard?

If it bounces of the players glove or Jose Canseco’s head, is that on the fly?

You don't put a touch of sour cream on anything, the correct portion is always a dollop.

Egg salad with lettuce, tomato and peppers. Fried egg sandwich should have bacon, but would be good with mushrooms and peppers or as you described.

Because it’s not about having a comprehensive understanding of the game. The rule is based on specific corporal actions, not the player’s frame of mind or some other voodoo. If this were a judgment call based on intent then sure, you’d want more context. But I’ve watched 1000s of games over the last 25 years or so and…

Not enough excitement in the suburbs these days I guess. Keep being so real, pal.

I’m talking about the preposterous claim that having watched the whole game gives some level of enhanced perspective or authority as to what happened.

Your pearls sufficiently clutched?

It is a bullshit rule, but this is 1000% the right call under the rule. Even if the contact was completely accidental and incidental and inconsequential he slid past the bag without making an attempt (i.e. reach for) to stay on the bag. So your understanding of intent, to the extent that you gathered such by watching…

How did watching the game in its entirety give you a better perspective on that play?

Anyone who knows anything about the law knows that cases where one party “knows” they are going to lose (and “lose” is fluid on appeals, FYI) either are decided without arguments/trial based on summary judgment or are settled. Sorry that someone told you otherwise.

And butter

Yeah I checked and it's still there - now off you go to occupy something because reasons

I’ve rarely read something so stupid from both a logical and common sense perspective. Congrats dumbass, get back to the drum circle with your peers!

Because someone burned their own couch and some asswhipe? Much worse things happened in Philly last night that were completely unrelated to the game.

Eh, he got hit a lot harder back in 2007. He will be fine.