One of the most entertaining past times for me was always tracking down the person who killed me, and knifing them to get revenge. This is a form of trolling to me, that is harmless.

I do the same thing (acting like a noob). It never goes super deep, but you'd be surprised how well the excuse "This is my brother's xbox, I've never played this before" works.

There's two kinds of trolling in my experience: soft trolling and hard trolling. A soft troll would be someone who tells you to jump over a ledge in Halo, which leads to your untimely death, and chuckles for everyone. A hard troll is someone actually harassing other players online (ex. bringing the kid to tears in…

I can't speak for OP, but personally, it seems that IV's multiplayer was meant to be inherently chaotic, with everybody having the same access and privileges, in so far as guns/vehicles. V seems to try and establish RPG flavor into the whole thing: you have money, a custom character, a house, your own guns, cars,…

"I often wonder: If the wife of one of the owners had done this, and if the roles were reversed, would they take the team away from the man? Is it something sexist? Is it the man's club?"

This is great, but the X1 still doesn't have the games I want. This might get ragged on here, but until a good baseball game shows up on the X1, the PS4 will be purchased first by me.

Before we address armrests, may we take the far more pressing issue of assholes on cellphones? Those dicks ruin movies for everyone. You can survive without texting, tweeting, and facebooking for two hours, asshat. I hate them so very much. They are the scum of the movie going world.

I get that. I agree with it. After all, there's a reason the "director's cut" exists. Ultimately though, isn't 99% of the books we read, movies we watch, and games we play a product? Video Games have far more contributing factors in their creation, compared to a novel or even a movie, but at it's core is a game not…

It was unfortunate because instead sticking to their guns, they caved to the internet rage. They made a game, it was their vision, not ours. We consumed it, we didn't create it. We're allowed to have an opinion on it, but it isn't ours to demand change to based upon our feelings towards it.

You just nailed in 5 sentences, what I spent 3 paragraphs on. Kudos to you.

I find the entire school of thought in this article troubling. Primarily, the entitlement that it assumes. It's the assumption that because you are a fan of "Show A" and you talk online a whole bunch about "Show A", that the creators of "Show A" should listen to, and change their product based upon your comments.…

Quinn, if she were a dude, in 20 years.

And this is why I don't stay once the credits roll.

I was going to make a snarky comment about Call or Duty being dumb, then I realized that if people want to enjoy it, more power to them. I probably won't ever play it, as Battlefield is more my cup of tea, but if people find something in CoD to enjoy, who am I to rain on their parade?

Two things.

I'm walking over this chicken dinner, but I'm still hungry :/

Eh, I could've worded it better. Sterling is going to make a solid profit selling the Clippers, so beyond getting his toy taken away, he won't be hurt that much.

A mark that hurts, I hope.

Excellent user name. Have some internet points.