burnthisburner1
burnthisburner1
burnthisburner1

It’s important to note, according to the researchers, that none of the women used words like “rape” or “coercion,” even though the sex they described could reasonably be categorized that way. Instead, they merely described it as “bad sex”

I know the difference between black people and niggers. I’m all in favor of black people, It is only that small percent you are talking about that I hate. I’m just a little bit surprised how that 5 percent of the population can commit 38 percent of the murders in America, so I think your percentages might be a little

lol “Stay cozy with everyone! Just report what they hand you!” Sorry, nah.

You’re a journalist, right? Contact him again and clarify what you were asking until you either get an answer or a “no comment”. I’m so over game journalists who write good things but never go the extra mile when it comes to others. Look at the RE7 demo nonsense, no journalists helped us get an answer from Capcom as

Because I bought #1 and couldn’t finish it because I just lost interest :(. I also refuse to play games out of order which means I’ll never learn if Assassin’s creed becomes more than “climb this wall simulator”

Yup, and wtf is up with mentioning his race every three sentences? Admittedly some of the instances flow with the description of the man, but more than a couple left me thinking “what does it matter if he’s white?” You hit the nail on the head.

It’s not a good game and the controls are not responsive enough for what it wants to be. Everything is delayed and if you aren’t a 12 year old COD player with lightning reflexes you’ll just be frustrated with it.

Jesus, I’m so tired of this reductive bullshit.

This is quickly becoming our reality. Criticism has become harassment and is inherently sexism. Safe spaces have taken the place of freedom of speech on college campuses. Dissenting opinions have become triggering because people no longer have the backbone or strength of character to deal with someone disagreeing with

I find specifically mentioning someone’s race multiple times when it’s irrelevant to the particular story to be questionable, if not offensive, since it implies that the individual’s race is somehow important to the story.

Better being an anti-SJW than a SJW-cuck, right?

At least there is logic behind the anti movement and none on the SJW one.

“Oh you disagree with my views, you must be ______” -Typical liberal response.

Obviously he dislikes it because he’s sexist, but because he doesn’t want to appear sexist he found a bunch of valid reasons to disguise his intent. It’s crazy what the SJW have driven us to. It’s like white males don’t have rights anymore.

I noticed that too. If the subject of the article was black and the author kept pointing it out, despite the fact that said subject’s output is completely unrelated to issues of race, people would be getting uptight indeed.

It should if you have half a brain. He’s a person, his name is James Rolfe. The author wasn’t pointing out his skin color as just an observation, there was an agenda behind mentioning it, and that’s wrong to do, no matter what color someone’s skin is.

It’s obvious this writer is only interested in stating their position on the Ghostbusters thing, but shrouded it with writing a history of James Rolfe. Anybody with a brain can see that.

Like the dumbshits that think “lmao” is a word?

Skipped right over Silicon valley and ended up in jersey. Amazing work here!

“I don’t like his opinions therefore he’s bigoted”

This is a great and healthy way to view the world.

Found the angry femenist

“his point is more to do with how we’ll never get a Ghostbusters 3 with the original cast,” Um no his point was the fact that this movie doesn’t tie directly with the originals as a direct sequel. He wanted original cast members even if it was just to pass the torch to the new team. He doesn’t like that by the