That’s a fine list of Greggs ranked by newsiest right now, but doesn’t really mean anything else.
That’s a fine list of Greggs ranked by newsiest right now, but doesn’t really mean anything else.
You see a black background on that flag, buddy?
All that accomplishes is trading brain injury for skull fractures. It wouldn't be an improvement.
Sure, but it's worth remembering that by the time Bortles got his extension, the alternative was Case Keenum or Sam Bradford.
If it makes you feel better, I’d bet money it’s an attempted clever nod to Ada (Lovelace, née Byron, recognized inventor of the first computational algorithm and namesake for that programming language).
Inasmuch as a single score, possession or turnover in basketball matters just a little less than one in football, this may not be a perfect comparison.
Of course. Just be prepared for a lot of people to assume you’re Catwoman.
It’s not effortless: the sugar syrup is fussy, the marshmallow is super sticky and will get everywhere if you’re not careful, to the extent that if you don’t have a stand mixer or especially big mixing bowl it’s probably not worth it.
Unless it’s said sarcastically, which it nearly always is. Of all the things to grind a prescriptivist ax over, could v couldn’t is definitely among the dumbest.
It’s one of those terrible terms that came from the late-nineties wave of political correctness
So what you’re saying is that we can all agree that a fumble is always the result of a loss of possession, but if the live loose ball on the field doesn’t result from a loss of possession (which pretty much exactly and only happens on punts), we need more than one word depending on intent?
I don’t think it’s a meaningful distinction. It’s not a live ball until touched by a Giants player, and OBJ was that player. The Giants weren’t fielding that ball (and at the goal line, there’s no reason they should have).
You picked a strange place to stop reading:
Sadly, that’s the American dream. The American reality is more like being shunted into arbitration for 3-5 years and getting offered a voucher toward a new replacement vehicle that doesn’t fail to account for depreciation on your car after it was taken. Probably requiring an NDA too.
That sounds nice and all but a huge percentage of total american wages already goes to structural inefficiencies as makework. What else would you call private health insurance and the office and hospital coders whose sole purpose is to interpret it?
The argument for Kavanaugh’s technical honesty is that Casey v Planned Parenthood matters far more than Roe v Wade in terms of beating back TRAP laws/etc. So he’s standing behind the lesser standard and pretending there’s no difference to give “moderates" cover.
Forget about him? He's poised to be on the supreme court for thirty or more years. Kavanaugh *is* the long game.
No. They were posed questions by a series of different and untrained people with different motives.
The ‘will of the people' included the three fifths compromise which was the basis for electoral vote allocation. Still want to call it a feature?
He won't stop getting game checks, but any incentives or per-game roster bonuses will disappear. This is usually a bigger deal for players with an injury history (Sam Bradford and Richard Sherman being big examples just this year) but overall, a player will nearly always get as much money if they get hurt as if they…