Oh great, must be great to have so much self-confidence that you take to the internet to proclaim your superior sexual prowess. You do you.

Well then in a few years he can write a letter to HamNo and everyone will feel sorry for him.

I'm lost.

If it takes you an hour and a half to have sex then you are bad at sex. Hope that helps you out.

What the hell is wrong with 10 minutes of pumping?

You state the very reason that it is a good tool across generations. Because it accounts for whether you are playing in more of a hitting era or more of a pitching era. That is why it is good across generations, perhaps better than any other stat. How else would you look at players across generations?

I think you are vastly overstating the difference in eras re: PEDs. And though I don't personally suspect either Ripken or Jeter of using PEDs, I wouldn't be my life on it.

I don't think you understand what WAR is. WAR is not muddled by differences in average league performance, it equalizes by average league performance. It accounts for the fact that the game changes so just looking at counting stats doesn't give a great picture of how good players are. The stat shows how many more…

Ripken's WAR is higher. 92.5 to 74.2. Jeter is hurt by being one of the worst defensive players in baseball history.

Oh man you told me to calm down now I'm really mad!

So you think if Obama snorted coke today it wouldn't matter. Because millions of people elected him president despite the fact he admitted to snorting coke when he was young?

So you are suggesting that the 5 Cir./Supreme Court imagined they were admissions officers at UT and the policy was not in place. And if under this imaginary scenario she would be admitted then the case moves forward. But if under this imaginary scenario she would not be admitted then the case is thrown out. That…

It isn't about being right it is about being honest when you make an argument. You can argue that she should be fully responsible, but when you don't acknowledge settled and indisputable facts your argument loses credibility.

It is my take like my take is that Americans tend to be patriotic during the Olympics and that Coke is more popular than Pepsi.

It has to do with the fact that we as a society still "watch over" these adults at some level even when they are no longer a minor. You can't drink until you are 21, you can stay on your parent's insurance until you are in your mid-20's. I'm not saying I agree with this, but you are just saying you view an 18 year…

SCOTUS granted cert and issued a ruling. They vacated the lower court ruling and remanded to the Circuit Court. Who is having trouble reading here?

Ok, well the guy saying Ripken is more clutch because he could hit a meatball his last All-Star game is as wrong as you are. Jeter probably could have too if he retired last year or the year before like he should have.

You are wrong. The Circuit Court/SCOTUS is ruling on the Constitutionality of the law, it is an EP case. You don't need particular facts in an EP case, just to show that the law generally violates the EP clause. Else you fall into the trap of bad facts make bad law. Put another way, the Constitutionality of this…

I didn't get into UT Austin and went to a T14 law school.

Odd that there was no basis and yet her case made it to the Supreme Court. Which is really beside the point. The point isn't the plaintiff it is the law and whether it is Constitutional. The last thing this case should turn on is an examination of her college application.