“Should an hourly paid security guard violate their company policy, at peril of his job, by letting an intoxicated non-guest in the building, for WHATEVER reason?”
“Should an hourly paid security guard violate their company policy, at peril of his job, by letting an intoxicated non-guest in the building, for WHATEVER reason?”
Curious how many people who drowned did not know how to swim. If I couldn’t, I’m not sure I would ever feel comfortable getting on a boat.
Born Rich is a documentary from 2003 made by an heir to the Johnson and Johnson wealth. Interestingly enough, Ivanka was in it quite a bit.
I think you have trouble with reading comprehension. “For whatever reason” does not mean “for any reason at all” in this context. I am saying that asking an hourly paid security guard to decide on his own when and when not to violate policy is unreasonable. And I was pointing out that you contradicted yourself.
I think it’s probably just wise to let someone who says they really need to go use the facilities. It would have saved everyone a lot of trouble i n this case, no?
And this WAS the case, where it was closed to non-guests because it was late (I could not find the time, but hotel front desks, especially in Scottsdale, are typically open until 11 or midnight). Should an hourly paid security guard violate their company policy, at peril of his job, by letting an intoxicated non-guest…
No argument; there is a small percentage of the population that does indeed have some challenges. Does that mean we make every private business allow their restroom to be a public toilet? I say no, you say yes. I could even see perhaps encouraging larger companies to do so, but if you have ever worked in small…
Ah, whataboutism.
Everyone’s bathroom needs are their own issue to handle. Is there anything LESS the responsibility of others?
And most are for the protection of others. Which ones fit this?
Was just trying to see where you draw the line. It’s like I don’t see your logic, but I’ll admit, putting the onus on private businesses to be the public toilets for the general population seems unfair to business owners. And it is enough of an issue that placed like Circle K don’t allow ANYONE to use the bathroom.
It’s already basically a public bathroom if the business is open to the general public.
And so that’s where we disagree. I feel it is the right of the business owner to make that decision, and you don’t. You feel that a private bathroom (because it is a private business) should be a public bathroom, and I don’t.
Total plug for a friend, but it IS a great book. My friend (and trivia teammate!) Jeremy wrote this book; it certainly seems timely now.
(Man in engineering) Totally agree! Though it’s a tricky line, being too “agreeable” (one of the Big Five personality traits) does not correlate with workplace success, and women (in general) are more agreeable than men. And if you are too agreeable about what you described, you will be tagged as the one to do that…
Actually, yes, the idea of a private business being able to decide, without any limitation whatsoever, who uses their business IS something I disagree with.
I didn’t realize it was about a person who wanted to go swimming, which is not a basic or unavoidable human need,
Businesses are not open to “the general public,” you moron. They are open to those in the general public who are CUSTOMERS, and you don’t HAVE customers at your house.
No, I’m saying that private businesses have the right to restrict the use of their business to paying customers. Why don’t you get to use the gorgeous pool at most resorts? Oh, you mean I need to be a GUEST here?? THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!