burnerofcourse
burnerofcourse
burnerofcourse

You have difficultly with logic. You think the reaction from the FA was because she was afraid of losing her job, when knowingly putting a pet in the overhead bin against STRICT regulations against having them ANYWHERE other than on the floor is a firing offense already. Okay, that make no sense. So in order to

Well, I guess that’s where we disagree. You think for some reason the FA decided to violate company policy (possibly losing her job for that alone) and throw a dog into the overhead bin, when leaving where it was was a policy that got her off the hook for even caring about the bag’s location. She also then risked

There’s no someone to burn. The FA is anonymous.

But honestly, you’re obviously dedicated to seeing this story from a defensive perspective regarding the flight attendant.

Again, I have a feeling this is going to come down to a massive miscommunication; the reason why airlines wants pets on the floor is so if they have an “accident” is it easily cleaned up, and I find it hard to believe any flight attendant would not know this rule AND the reason for it, especially since AA has animals

Gremminger’s tweets are now protected and cannot be seen. Do you have a link?

The comment about the flight attendant being shocked that there was a dog in the bag was also in the Buzzfeed article, and the source is the same source as most of the other information (Maggie Gremminger), right? 

The flight attendant knew there was a dog according to multiple witness accounts

Again, she was assured by the flight attendant that the dog would be fine.

Well someone is either lying or “mistaken”. I would just like to know the truth. I am admittedly a bit biased having friends who are flight attendants, but I just can’t imagine any flight attendant not knowing that pets can go NOWHERE except on the floor; even if you take them out and set them on an empty seat next to

What about this in the same article?

“Another passenger told ABC News on Tuesday that the flight attendant was not aware that there was a dog in the bag when she requested it be placed overhead, and was, according to this witness, “frazzled and shocked” when the flight landed and the dog, deprived of water and air for

I had not even heard of it, though it sounds pretty good from a couple articles I just read. It does sound like it is more geared toward investing than Mint, which is good. Thanks for the tip!

I found one of the keys to Mint is to RADICALLY limit of the number of categories you use; I use maybe like 15. They have about a million, and it does me no good to know some weird category that I spend $3 every 4 months or something similar.

Once you categorize a bit, Mint gets pretty good at putting things in the

I use nothing but Mint (spending tracking, budgeting, investment growth all in one) and my Schwab app to deposit the occasional check or move money between my Schwab checking and my investment accounts there. If you have no need to ever deposit cash, then banking at Schwab is pretty sweet; completely free, if you

Keep writing these articles; maybe it can offset the stupidity written at Vice.

How about people at least understanding the very basic and very IMPORTANT value of compound interest? FFS, the money one puts IN to their 401k is a pittance compared to what it will grow due to compound interest. I spend a lot of time explaining this to young millenial friends, because they had no idea.

The stock market over the last 80 years has AVERAGED 9.7% per year. I have no idea where you are getting your 4% number.

The NFL knows; it’s the fans who are idiots and don’t understand, at least most of the time.

So a man is angry that a woman would not answer his question, and he is damn entitled to an answer, so he writes an entire article complaining that a woman would not do as he pleased.

Why are these posts showing up on Gizmodo, FFS? Slow tech news day?