Fuck me? I would if I could!

Nope: “An Australian woman has been banned from breastfeeding her 11-month-old because she got a tattoo four weeks earlier,”

Are you telling me, that displying your latest tattoo on social media is not a thing? Really?

Wel, there’s always Lena Dunham’s sister for you.

Ask yourself. You’re a jezebel reader.

Here’s what she could have done; wait until weaning just a few months later, considering the baby was already 10 months old at the time she decided to get the tattoo.

would choose to go to a tattoo parlor that has dirty needles and unsanitary conditions that would result in her getting HIV or any other disease.

What control issue are you talking about? Nobody is trying to take the child away from her. This was not a custody trial. Please stop comparing a necessary everyday activity like getting out of the house or driving with getting a tattoo. That’s like saying ‘hey, why can’t I speed on a bike not wearing a helmet, when I…

The gist being that scientists still are conflicted about the risks of infectious transmission through tattooing. Why take a chance, just to show your shiny new tattoo to your friends or take just another selfie on instagram, instead of waiting a few month? Is that ‘policing women’?

This isn’t a real risk

Never heard of netiquette? All caps is akin to FUCKING SCREAMING!! but you knew that already, didn’t you?

Let me irritate you a little bit more, since you seem to come to a final conclusion as to what the infection risks are concerned, unlike scientists:

Tell us more about your life with agoraphobia!

The most common occurrence would be a Hepatitis C infection, not HIV.

Those stupid fucks from the Mayo Clinic disagree, but what do they know anyway?

Does your voice ever get coarse from SCREAMING AT THE TOP OF YOUR LUNGS, just to make your arguments appear to being more forceful?

Think about the difference between a necessary everyday activity and easily avouidable risks, if ever so small and tell me, if you really want to equate the two?

Sure, while we’re at it making up absurd notions that none of us ever mentioned - why not strapping the baby on her back, get on a bike and careen down the highway at top speed - no helmet of course, because YOLO! It’s not that she has any responsibility for a completely helpess human being she brought into this life.

Yes, comparing nutrition and transportation to a lifestyle accessory that she could have had any time after she stopped breastfeeding her already 10 month old baby at the time she got the tattoo, is a totally valid argument (slowclap)

Or she could have waited just a little while longer before getting a tattoo, therby not taking any chances. That’s not wrapping yourself in glad wrap imo. I wonder what would go through her mind if, by any chances, the baby would be infected. Is that something that a mother could ever forget for the rest of her life?