burnerburnerburnerbanmelater
burnerburnerburnerbanmelater
burnerburnerburnerbanmelater

Are you guys not aware that civility is important among those with differing opinions? Take a lesson from Obama. He doesn’t agree with Trump on virtually anything, but he doesn’t have to yell in his face and tell him how stupid he is every chance he gets.

Trump actually HAS said a bit about what he plans to do. Not that most liberals have taken the time to read about that. It’s too easy to just call him a racist misogynist who will destroy the country.

I can’t wait to see a healthy GSW squad sweep LeBron this year.

3-1 lead

LeBron is a fantastic player. That doesn’t make him immune to criticism.

The same LeBron who was gifted his second title by Walter Ray Allen Jr.

I think you’re a *little* harsh on the assessment of Liverpool talent. Coutinho, Firmino, and Sturridge are top class. Guys like mane, origi, lovren, and clyne are pieces that any team would be happy to have.

Sic-ing is just the kinja way to be a pretentious turd. It irks me to no end when the clowns here pull that garbage.

He was cut because he can no longer do his job. End of story.

AFAIK, any defendant’s name would be made public in such an instance.

FYI, her name is known. Most publications have a policy of hiding the names of alleged victims of sexual violence, which is why most publications continued to call her Jane Doe throughout the trial.

It offers *some* shares to the general public.

Go buy some Class B NYT stock, then get back to me.

Yes it is. Its ownership structure is dual tiered.

Can we stop calling her Jane Doe now that the justice system has proven her to be a liar and not a victim?

Yes, and the definition of a privately held company is that the public cannot buy shares of the company. The NYT Co is both, and it’s disingenuous not to say that.

No. NYT Co is not controlled by all shareholders. It is controlled by some shareholders, and those shareholders are the founding family.

It’s more nuanced than the public status of many companies that are publicly traded. It is not, as you have claimed, an either or proposition.

We’re not in disagreement that he won’t make the majors. I just seem less spiteful about his faith and more willing to acknowledge his extraordinary athletic abilities and accomplishments.

1. “Substitute for actual ability” does more than imply you believe he has no ability. It directly states it.