burner362
burner362
burner362

It may be sampling bias on my part, but it does seem like the site is going... lite lately.

This makes me sad that a website for grown women is following the rest of the media in fetishizing the teenage offspring of two formerly good-looking and famous people. That’s the entire sum of her ‘talent’ and no good can come of thrusting a fifteen year old into fame as we have seen time and time again. Sad all

Which of These Aspiring Sex-Havers Will You Spend the Blizzard With?

and the second one being a raging pot addict and drunk to boot.

I’m in my 50s. I have so many stories of how women had to go through hell to get an abortion or birth control and what happened when they couldn’t get one or both.

And like two minutes in Zoolander.

Not to be this guy, but: Sanders voted against the actual Hyde Amendment to begin with, so there’s that. Sanders has a 100% rating from NARAL Pro-Choice because of his voting record and stance on choice issues, so I think it’s fascinating that anyone could try to argue that he hasn’t made women’s issues a big enough

The Republican Party should just adopt this image.

I live in Indiana. In 1971 I had to fly to NYC to get an abortion. New York and one other state were the only two places in the country where it was legal.

Fuck off back to Russia Today, troll.

Hillary Clinton would just be an extension of the Obama administration...The only way you’re going to see a bigger defense budget and ANY chance of new F-22s is with a Republican.”

Only because they assumed you could bomb the shit out of Kadena without major reprisals. Like us bombing the shit out of Chinese airfields on the mainland AND bringing Japan into the war.

We have much less economic dependence on China than most people think. The US is the largest consumer market in the world by a long shot, and there are plenty of willing suppliers. Stock market trends aren’t necessarily indicative of the real situation.

I’ve got plenty of lead.

The AESA in the F-35 is constantly getting upgraded, and they have experimented with using AESAs for high-bandwidth communications (like realtime data you mentioned).

Clinton may be trying to run on Obama’s coattails with some constiuencies but there has been no love lost between the Clintons and the Obama people. ‘08 was supposed to be Hiliary’s turn and they haven’t forgotten that.

Clinton also voted for Iraq. Obama wasn’t there yet to vote against it but I’d say in general the

While I agree with the sentiment of your statement “Technology gets cheaper as time goes on” this wouldn’t improve the cost of bringing a legacy design back into production. In fact, the progression of technology has most likely made the cost of building an F-22 today more expensive as components (i.e. electrical

Air to air is not the only thing in air warfare, we need AA platforms, yes...but air to ground/air to surface is a bit more important. The F-22 is not going to be as good as the F-35 for air to mud, period. Also, the F-35 will be just fine at air to air, might need more missiles, but it’ll have numbers and SA on its

It would be cheaper to make the F-16 V or other variant, ot he F-15 silent Eagle, which has stealth and battle field networking designed into the aircraft.