If you look closely, you’ll see that this guy is actually hundreds of rats in a suit.
If you look closely, you’ll see that this guy is actually hundreds of rats in a suit.
If she's already at the "Biden is Evil" level of crazy there's no reasoning to be done. He's not my favorite and he's definitely made mistakes but there's a large gap between semi competent with a little bit of scummy and evil.
I like how you can see the “guy holding her hostage” literally looking on in fear and confusion when she was removed from the train by this fucking dipshit rapist fuck.
What about the guy ‘holding her hostage’? Is he just going to let it go like that?
Her candidacy will not terminate until the last dollar has been grifted (with love, of course).
He was thinking with his dick and his dick is a fucking idiot.
My favorite part in all this is they don’t seem to understand that “I did bad shit to prove they did bad shit” is not a valid defense of your bad shit. Like let’s say the Bidens are guilty as hell (nothing suggests they are) but let’s just pretend. Hunter and Joe are deep in the weeds doing all this shit in Ukraine…
Take your weird L (no charges??) and move on dude, trying to make a bigger publicized deal out of it is just going to blow up in your stupid face <_<
I too would love to see him testify.
I get that he’s the Pope of the people and all that, but he still doesn’t deserve to be grabbed—he’s not public property. Because if some guy had grabbed a woman like that, and she had slapped his hand away, we’d probably think it was OK, right?
I almost never blame actors for acting in a bad movie for the money. They’re just there to do their work in their part - if they do a professional job acting, then the failure of the movie is on the director and producer (which it usually is).
I always loved Michael Caine discussing Jaws 4: The Revenge.
Yeah. It doesn’t age well at all.
Years ago, Bette Midler told her Vegas residency audience, “I said they couldn’t pay me enough to commit to this. (pregnant pause) Oh. Yes. They. Can!” [she got $22million a year for 3 years. That’s “Oh.Yes.They.Can” money!]
A version without the fur and showing everyone in their green mocap suits would break even at the box office, I betcha.
His argument is based entirely on the concept of “coercive confinement” as a means to force her to testify. As to the many assertions that solitary confinement is torture, I found no evidence that she is being held in solitary. She’s been in gen pop since her arrest according to the sources I read. I think it’s fair…
Hmmm .. reading the Guardian link, it sounds to me that the “torture” is merely the act of continuing Manning’s detention? (as opposed to active torture like waterboarding, stress positions, etc.) ...
I read the link, Manning is NOT being tortured. That word carries a connotation that isn’t being met by the evidence.
It’s a silly, regressive term like “Hillbot*.” Why bother with an asterisk when you can just not use it anymore.