burnburnburnyourmom
burnyourmomfirst
burnburnburnyourmom

I found the argument for taking all those non-coaches with interesting though. Namely that it’s good for morale and will lead to spouses being more supportive of the absurd hours and commitment necessary to get back. Now, I don’t say I found it persuasive, but I don’t find it entirely unpersuasive either. It might be

About half the lawyers at my firm have liberal arts, philosophy, etc. kinds of degrees. Our first year associates are paid $160,000 plus eligibility for a bonus of around $20 or 30k (it changes every year, but should be in that range this year). Many others with those degrees become professors and make in the low 6

Like being the most law abiding Steeler QB?

...because Mike Millen wasn’t available to tell us about player evaluation?

The people saying it’s not, they know it is.

Because the athletes that get politically involved tend to be more like Curt Schilling and less like an actual human with a brain. I know what you were thinking there, but you were also entirely misreading that comment. The OP is saying he’s astonishingly well-read, as in much more well read than pretty much anyone.

I should add to this that I voted for W and blame myself as much as anyone. But I was young and bought a bill of goods, like the rest of this country, and I called the UN and much of the rest of the world names for not supporting our bloodlust. I guess the bright side is that I learned from those mistakes rather then

God I miss him.

It’s not “dissent” when conservatives are largely throwing their support behind a less charismatic version of Mussolini and the remainder of the field is a band of lunatics that are the only people in the world still denying global warming, even after Exxon admitted it. It’s being an idiot and an asshole. To the