@Bluecold: i'm not sure how single chicks and expensive booze go together..

that really is a sweet table

IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE IPHONE OR HOW IT IS PERFORMING, RETURN IT FOR A FULL REFUND.

@oyumurtaci: yes - and ipads are at least twice as useful, so even $250 still seems high

@Alluvian: in my experience, it certainly means that! and being an american, i must force my opinion on you....

casey chan?

@ninjamurf: 80 years ago, if a player was a step or two offsides, no one would have noticed/cared, because no one would have seen it. Now, we have hi def slomo replays that show details we never could have seen before.

@Arken: one cannot buy a computer for $300 and expect it to be fault-free.

@CaptnStarbring: why are the last 44 seconds not cropped off that video

@Keni: NOOOOOOO DON'T DO IT.

@Arken: at $300 it is. decent build quality does not come cheap. selling a full sized computer for $300 is just asking for something to go wrong.

if google just did what hulu does (5 second ads for short video clips, 30 second ads for longer tv shows) i think google would make a lot more $$$

@trexchard: i agree - either $10/mo or free with ads. that seems fair and reasonable.

still time to submit?

@Winston Smith: +1

i'm not one for ads, but everyone with cable now is not allowed to complain about paying and having to watch ads.

@Chernobyl: to everyone saying it's too expensive -

what did they do 70 years ago with the original world cup? there were no instant replays, people just went off the ref's call.

@Brad Roth: ...like designing a car that can't make right hand turns if you hold the steering wheel the wrong way.

@kylecpcs: his "porn free" conversation was much more so