You are correct, I was incorrect. As usual.
You are correct, I was incorrect. As usual.
I’d argue that if you had a priceless 1 of 1 piece of history it’s no longer worthy to be called a “car.” It’s days of being a car are over.
Not swing axle, trailing arms:
Share the love!
I’m fortunate to have a cool somewhat desirable car, that’s known to be a bit difficult to drive.
That is one brilliant, scathing comment.
I still like the original SRX the best - I dug the lifted slab sided wagon look more than the inflated Chrysler Pacifica minivan shape.
Kona Edition Focus? Came in the exclusive “dirt” paint color (really!) and came with a mountain bike?
I dunno, I thought it was pretty brilliant marketing at the time. Buy a car, get a free bike. Or something like that.
Mercury did it too!
I hate to say it, but those seats are pretty badass.
I’m pretty blutly not a Chrysler fan, but that was the best car they’ve made in years. Hold on to it!
English is my strempf.
Star click was for D12. Nice.
The SRT-4 (don’t call it a Neon) was for all intents and purposes a great car. Big, turbo power, optional real LSD, no mufflers, and a decent chassis.
Or on a smaller scale, would you rather have a nice meal at a five star steakhouse or a couple of weeks of Hot & Ready pizzas?
The Dodge Caliber “Fairy” ad was just horrible.
Oh gee, I’ve never read a review about a gt3rs like that before. OH WAIT.
I’d wager that most, if not all, potential GT3 RS customers have already had one or more base 911 Carreras already.
That’s pretty much all plastic surgery, no?