burdickjp
burdickjp
burdickjp

I WANT IT.

Speaking of airframes of that vintage seeing service again, have you read about the OV-10X?

They’re like the rotary-wing version of the C130, which doesn’t surprise me, considering they’re of similar vintage. Airframe from that time just seems to be indestructable.

What do you suggest is wrong with it?

If you’re going to ignore that you can get a micro four-thirds camera that is the same size and cheaper, then I’ll have to nominate the Panasonic LX100. It has dedicated manual controls and an amazing sensor and lens pairing. It’s also $780 :(

If you’re going to ignore that you can get a micro four-thirds camera that is the same size and cheaper, then I’ll

Panasonic GM5 or Olympus EPL7. Both are micro four-thirds. Attach pancake zoom. Have a 4/3” sensor and zoom for the size of a point-and-shoot. The Oly is a bit cheaper at $600.

Panasonic GM5 or Olympus EPL7. Both are micro four-thirds. Attach pancake zoom. Have a 4/3” sensor and zoom for the

Here’s another one for it. The lever reminds me of the parking brake on a VW type 2.

DAMMIT. There are no Celica alltracs right now.

Because this was designed in Japan and the steering wheel is on the left I’m going to assume this is a really elaborate way to tease us.

That was my job!

Mark Donohue. He pioneered a lot of race car engineering.

I want to see inside those pretty aluminum pieces in the intake.

The second most amazing thing about that travel voucher is that until relatively recently (2010 or so) the Army used a very, very similar form.

Naming rights. It was the first known moon. Therefore “moon”.

Woah, Ross drove the wall into Ryan? That’s badass. Most everyone else would’ve driven Ryan into the wall.

I’ve been looking for my next read. Thanks.

A HS buddy of mine had an ‘80s FWD Oldsmobile we named “The Blue Bomber”. He grenaded the transmission and his family helped him locate a new car. Exactly the same, but darker, so we called it “The Bluer Bomber”.

Insulting me does nothing but betray your arrogance.

Premis 3 is wrong. If net torque is non zero then there is acceleration, and therefore motion. Power is the product of that motion and torque, not the other way around. Power does not produce acceleration, torque does.