btj61642--disqus
btj61642
btj61642--disqus

They're both too hot for him, but I think what you're talking about happens in the next episode.

Going after Oswald without sufficient proof is too dangerous. Whether he was the actual assassin or not, he's still an important historical figure and the obdurate past would likely try to protect him.

And, bonus, then we'd get the exciting scenes of Jake visiting a stockbroker, returning to the present, cashing out that stock, then returning to the past, instead of the tedious and boring scenes of him ripping off a bookie then beating up a thug.

Yeah, this is one of the fairly few times where the movie really improves on the book.

It's about Benton Quest's bodyguard.

I read the book right after seeing the movie in the theater, and it's VERY different. If you thought the movie took too hard a turn into a supernatural explanation, then the book may not be for you.

Probably, but you've got a whole year to watch the first one.

Question for anyone who's seen it, as spoiler-free as possible: what is the level/amount of "jump scare" style moments in this? My wife wants to see it, and so do I, but she is concerned about a lot of jump scare stuff, which she feels like she can't handle or doesn't want to deal with in public. Is this something

I just watched it last night, and I can't decide if this is the show at its best or at its worst.

I was talking to a friend of mine last year after he read the Making Of book about the trilogy, and he was telling me about how apparently Eric Stoltz didn't work out because he took the material too seriously and didn't give it the comic charm that is Michael J Fox's bread and butter. And we agreed that while it was

Oh, come on. This is ridiculous. Marty absolutely does not try to sleep with his mother. His MOTHER tries to sleep with HIM. It's TOTALLY different.

"Neither!"