brprod
Juben
brprod

MsMichelleR 8 years and she doesn't know what her residual income from a single book or in general is? I find it odd people are happy she is bragging about new found wealth at the mistake of people. Some of reasons well Stephen King is already rich / people's fault. She should of donated her new found checks could of

many infomercials come with preshipping return forms as well or will send you a link to print out a return form.

Its weird no one sees a problem with her using money that she got through mistake of others and bragging about it indirectly through a blog.

She knows that a mistake occurred and she appreciates the money, she did not earn through hard work but through a mistake on people? She should of returned the money and worked with the people and amazon to get their money back and donated her new found royalties.

Just like those infomercials people will not put effort into returning a book. She knows that is not her money yet uses it why not donate it. You do not see a problem with this?

So she knows with her new found check(s) thanks to Amazon instead of returning the money so it goes to Stephen King. She just spends on expensive dinners and trivial stuff then post on a blog on how she is spending the money and people are happy about this. Call me confused she didn't earn the money in anyway shape or

Met a young woman a year or two ago who was into casual sex back in her late college years (she got her masters 23-26). Long story short, she told me about it, I was like thats cool and slowly stopped talking to her. She said she was being open and wanted to tell me, I told her I am glad she could confide in me but I

yeah he played terrible the entire game with his light jogging want him benched

Don't let it get you. Forgot what month it was but jezebel said no one should tell a woman to smile it is rude and condescending etc. I remember asking this lady to smile because it was a beautiful day and she smiled and said something along the lines of thank you my mind is else where but thank you for trying to

If being able to select a character by gender is sole reason a person would choose to buy a game, I would tell them "good luck and take care." Forget if either game has better graphics, sound, experience lets put it all on one minor focal point and call it the day on all games. Next time I see a woman who buys metal

LOL if I ever found out someone choose a CoD game vs Battlefield game over a minor option like that tell them "wish them the best." Those two games very different even are both classified as shooters. Just making the comparison makes me wonder if you actively play both or have played both

How dare you bring up stats that may question who the company should design the game for. I like how the buyers market is split close in purchasing of games but the % between the genders who play certain genres differ heavily.

Miss the old Kotaku now we got the social justice warriors Kotaku ready for click bait. Thethuth sadly is right IGN is the way to go right now. Kotaku still has a few good articles here and there but far and few. Wish I could ignore all cosplay articles or linked articles. Gawker should allows to set up our own

Are we(gamers) really looking for political correctness in any video game or something i can be social justice warrior for?

You know how the news works 80% bad, 5% good and 15% weird. People would not click on articles if it was good news. But I definitely feel you on having some positive news even if it means less clicks.

Thank you forget the Tattoo talk about the bad play of Japan. Worry about silly tattoo later if either time makes it. Brian this had hopes to be a deadspin article in kotaku which would be welcomed vs social justice beckoning articles we get so often. I am sure people welcome more articles about your views of other

beautiful set of photos. Sad to say just do not like her red carpet comments the whole "The red carpet feels like a war zone, except you cannot fly or fight; you just have to stand there and take it." Be curious if jezebel will avoid this Nyong'o statement all together.

I do not think it is a troll attempt at all. It is stating what anyone who did any medical work would know Kat vs looking at now falsified documentation. DNA can't lie can't be manipulated (yes it can tested wrong) hence why we use it in court to prove so many various cases (murders/ kid cases/ etc). When it gets down

Simplistic terms yes XY, Xy, XX, Xx then when you want to get down to abnormalities there is XO, XXY, XYY, XXX then combine with recessive etc etc. Yes, i shouldn't of generalized it in such a simple fashion. Am I talking about the other traits? Don't care about hair color or height and the syndromes(like

One day we will just put the chromosomes. No matter what we do right now you can not change it. You are either XY or XX. Certificates can be changed but when it comes down to it in classification you are either XY or XX.