brotorious--disqus
ggggbabybabybaby
brotorious--disqus

it's too tempting a target. "if the bechdel test doesn't work in one particular instance, then that just proves feminism is bullshit! good work!"

as we all know, and as the article above clearly states, the bechdel test is THE definitive measure of sexism in any movie ever made.

i got one sort of in reverse: it was years before i could watch 30 rock, even though everyone was raving about it, because of the name of one its characters.

mysterio

do you remember "rapping duke"?

SO MUCH HAPPEN

@clarkebarrandthezagnutz:disqus

i guess i haven't really seen it abused.

nah brah

no, it's you. "oh no someone said 'problematic' imma shit myself!"

i was gonna say "vibranium," but i think marvel studios owns the movie rights to that substance

i made a movie?

my take on it was that harry already recovered his memory by that point and was trying to ruin petey's shit, but he wasn't willing to kill him outright, like a motherfucking goblin.

also, bill murray grabbing that one lady in meatballs

absolutely. raimi was perfect for spider-man. (it's well-established that the studio's desire for more villians was the real problem with 3.)

patently untrue.

"hitler did nothing wrong."

can't you see? the trade embargo is an allegory! an allegory that has nothing to do with any of the main characters or their motivations! SUBSTANCE

the crazy thing is: i agree with his premise. art builds on technology, informs it, INSPIRES it. art IS technology. science without imagination is useless.