I think he said that because he wanted to finalize everything before 2nd unveil. Part of the goal this time around is prevent feature creep. So any feature that does not make it through the review will not be shown off.
I think he said that because he wanted to finalize everything before 2nd unveil. Part of the goal this time around is prevent feature creep. So any feature that does not make it through the review will not be shown off.
i dunno man, imo you build your midengine/noengine/rearengine car like a 911 or an exotic. The bulbous fake grille was always my biggest point of contention with the Model S. Driving it was the best thing because you don’t have to look at that abomination that is the front end. But they FINALLY addressed that and I…
Tesla still beats Chrysler and they had 30 years since their second bankruptcy under Lee Iaccoca to fix their products.
Elon Musk says A Lot Of Things that are all lies
The Model 3 was originally supposed to be the Model E, but Ford put up a fuss about using Model E and thus deprived us of that bit of fun.
Would love to see a physics-based RTS where units don’t have set attack values, but instead projectile velocity and material that interacts with the material it hits.
“We always have the choice to buy a better experience; we do not have a right to be fully satisfied for a period of time based on past console cycles.”
“Great! I finally got the newest system!!....What? They are releasing a better one now? Fuck!”
Anything less than a 5 year lifespan, for me at least, negates the usefulness of purchasing a console at all.
Point being? none of this is hidden news. Again Tesla trying to do something good reduce the need for gas powered vehicles.
Seriously, I’m tired of my taxes subsidizing people that have children.
Tesla, private company trying to do something positive. As opposed to the forced millions taxpayers are focused to contribute to any number of other programs that are not trying to do such positive things.
Just about every industry is subsidized/given incentives somewhere along the line.
Think of it this way: the people buying the $85k cars are subsidising the development costs of the $35k cars.
I primarily play games through Steam, but outside of Windows 10 spontaneously upgrading—which was bullshit!—I’ve been very happy with Windows 10. No problems.
Non-compete clauses don’t exist in California by California law. Even for the lawn care companies.
Because the design flaws *in the core* of the vehicle (not doors and stuff) are minimal for what is the most innovative electric car out there?
As someone who wants to make as much money as possible, I always hated non-compete clauses anyway.
After commuting for many months on an older, buzzy cafe type motorcycle, I’ve learned that even the smallest amount of wind protection is very welcome. I also now know that I hate vibration. Good tires, correct suspension and solid handlebars make a huge difference. Good to read you again Damon.
Seems you don't understand the situation. Do you know what fair use is? Reviews fall under this and are 100% protected by law in favor of them. Siskel and Ebert didn't pay a dime to movie companies to review them (why would they pay them to shit on their movies?), yet they did and got paid millions for it by showing…