Techically speaking its illegal in at least one sate, mine, about a year back TN passed a law that made password sharing illegal. I've not heard it actually being used to prosecute yet though.
You say that it'll be seperate from Samsung, but do you mean from Samsung as a whole or just Samsung Electronics.
I've seen one of these on the road up in Kentuky once.
I just searched for 'Korn Download" on google and yeah it came up with pirate bay first.
Some of his videos here are done in the same way as this, for instance a comercial he did for McDonalds once.
You actually don't smoke hemp, its a very low THC content cousin of Marijuana. Smoking it would be a bit like drinking non-alchoholic beer, sure there's trace amount of alchohol but not enough to do anything.
I got a feeling they made a major killing on the Streak 5 military deal they made. Expecially if they also made life time support deals as goverment vendors tend to do.
My issue is not with tight pants, its with wearing pajama pants in public like its a fashion statement.
True they do, but its a dated style in my eyes. And lazy dressing to boot, looks like she's ready to go to bed early with a book and a cat not go out on the town and look sexy.
I've had a ton of success using it, that is after I took the time to learn how to use it properly in conjunction with my old clone brush, and manual painting practices.
Its generally not acceptable to wear spandex pajama pants out on a night on town. At least not since the late 80s.
Well it is a sexy beast, I have no problem showing my feelings on the thing.
Nope, I learned to type a few years ago.
Hooray for you Mr. Senator. I have a Palm Pre +.
There are a number of one person credits in the different non musician catagories. Apple Computer its self has its own seperate grammy in 2002. Walt Disney, not the Disney corporation got his own Trustee award in 89; the same catagory Jobs is being nominated for.
Actually yes, Sony/Phillips did recieve a technical grammy in 1998. Its not listed for sure that I can find about the cd, but thats the big thing those two teamed up for.
Oh I know, and I agree. They should, but even while I understand the content of the patent I can see why the USPTO might let some of these through. Day in and day out reading these, alot of it would come in as a Star Trek jargon doctument. Quick look on wiki says they only have 4,258 pattent examiners, I wouldn't be…
Reading the content of the universal one its written with so much legal double speak it hurts to read.
Are these the pattents Apple gets aproved on half days at the Pattent Office?