Once when I was young, my parents asked me this same question and wondered how I would go about testing it. It seems simple to me. Create a pathway with a constant water flow from the ceiling. Get about 10-20 people with a few sets of an extremely absorbent overcoat each. Have them walk through the path. Weigh…

How could your Steam buddy see you were playing Borderlands if you were offline?

So wait...you can't stream anything from your phone or other source? Who would want that?

On the other side it would be.

My friend has an Atari tattoo on his side and it looks badass. A lot of women don't know what it is so he makes up some horoscope story or something and it works pretty well. The women that do know what it is melt instantly.

woah that plane in the shot is awesome. what perspective

I'm actually surprised they haven't tried to market cars that way, it makes sense and is actually a good analogy for the logic used here. You CAN drive as often as you want, as far as you want, and you are free to refill the tank whenever you please. On data access, you can use their network whenever you want, as…

They claim it's unlimited because you are able to access it whenever you want. So you may have a data cap, but if you stay within that cap, you are free to access the network whenever you please. It's bullshit, but that's how they're able to make that claim.

If you are paying extra for Siri, you're doing it very, very wrong.

They've still got one decent rework left in cougar. Maybe Lynx too, but it sounds too much like Linux. Oh well, it won't be long before there is no OS X and only iOS (sigh), so the name won't matter.

You think so? Idk, I haven't used one since the 90s, perhaps they are more accurate, but giving up the use of gesture commands would seriously inhibit my efficiency.

That's the opposite of what waiting is...

That's absolutely true and hopefully one day it will pan out that way. The problem is as of today the labor force is filled with people who were either born too soon or simply haven't cared enough to learn anything other than how to purchase music on iTunes and navigate to Facebook. People under 30 aren't really…

Or anyone who has been in contact with him. Or anyone who has been in contact with those people. Or anyone etc, etc.

That was after they clarified they will just be calling all massive sums of money "a billion". I don't understand their logic, 30 billion sounds a lot more round and impressive to me, but that's why they keep calling everything "a billion".

from the article: "you're going to sell 30.2 million shares at a price somewhere between $28 and $35 billion, which we'll just call a billion dollars because it's a nice big round impressive number."

Jealous much?

Only 114,000 donors? How can that be? Nearly everyone I know is.