So intense! Double dual cam!

Yeah, me, too. But it's hard to make a case for a car that's really only a little more practical than a 308/328/348, and far less iconic in shape. Those back seats are next to useless. Oddly, it remains the only 4-seat open mid-engine car ever produced in volume.

Good one. Should be in AOTD.

The early 2000s, GTI 1.8T > GTI VR6

Isn't that an E39? The E36 Touring never got to the U.S., unfortunately.

Nice choice, but I think "held back" might be a better category. Plus, I think that saleswise the Boxster made a much bigger splash.

Actually, I'm surprised it's not higher. The M-B S65 has about the same fuel economy rating as the Lambo, and that sucker is over 5,000 pounds. Thanks to insane torque figures these cars are loafing most of the time.

I really don't see anything wrong with Modica's complaint. If he replaces General Motors and Obama with the NADA, his argument would actually kind of make sense.

This was a highly pleasing helping of snark. Well done.

Shouldn't Daniel Akerson be playing enemy of states' rights?

Let's see it articulate with a boot on the rear tire!

Intel's been experimenting with capacitors as well. If they can manage the power impulse, it might also appear as a hybrid fuel cell-capacitor system.

Apparently, you can homologate ugly.

The BMW X6 is so advanced you are literally surrounded by patent.

The paint is always greener on the other side.

Handheld electronic devices run deep.

Totally agreed. It does look a mess.

If you think of it as an homage to this, which is basically tuned and tinkered pre-war 328, it makes a little more sense.

Maybe if Volvo made this all standard equipment dealers might start stocking them. C30s pretty much amount to special order these days.

A stylish classic, but the price seems high. I'd sooner chase an SPG or an Opel Viggen for that money.