brainpharts
HemorrhagingBytes
brainpharts

A Google search will return a vast amount of articles regarding ‘no-go zones’ throughout Europe reported by outlets from 60 Minutes and the Washington Post down to Bob’s Blog (including video of aggression towards these reporters). That is a HUGE undertaking to gather all of those news organizations, as well as the

Although I don’t agree with the finger pointing of who’s to blame for the current state of the States (I assert that both parties have been essentially equally responsible over time), I couldn’t agree more that the ‘look-at-me’ politicians need to stay home. Political office used to be a position of limited civil

For the record - Nazis were Socialists. (the German National Socialist Party)

There have already been court cases (as mentioned, Irving Texas is one) and it will only be a matter of time before a liberal judge or judges will cave to political correctness (does the 9th circuit court ring a bell?).

...and appreciate the civil tone - nice to see it in these threads with all the name calling and bomb-throwers. Good luck with that. Moving on.

No. But if in the normal course of law enforcement the legal status of an individual is discovered (and all law enforcers should have the right to inquire), then I would expect all laws to apply.

Ethnicity, religion and origins don’t interest me. All are welcome - use the front door and adhere to the laws of the land. Will there be a few instances similar to your link? Sure. And there will be consideration given - that’s what judges are for. But there can’t be selective enforcement (‘go after gangs’). Laws

Let’s enforce the laws as written and intended - is that so ‘hard to want’? Legal immigration is how it’s been done for generations. Why should we welcome those that would cut the line and flout the law when so many are willing to follow proper procedure in an already existing path to citizenship?

This great experiment continues to succeed because immigrants came in, and continue to enter, through the front door legally. They assimilate, agreeing to abide by our countries laws while adding their culture, talents and work ethic. There is no call to end immigration - just an effort to enforce existing laws,

Day 1 - 7:30 am - medical examiner’s office - white shirt and tie - 8:30 am - run home to get a clean white shirt and tie (curiously, blood splatter and poop splatter look very similar on a white shirt) - note to self: cover the coffee mug with your free hand while walking past the work area (the splash zone).

A hearty ‘YEP’ to this one. The ‘journalists’ are the original social justice warriors. (not defending him but...) Trump’s view on the press may be understandable with around 90% of the news media registered with the Democrat party and a history of hypocritically peppering Republican politicians while lobbing

Planet-History-Denier

Let me see if I understand - illegal immigration is good because it’s perfectly fine that undocumented workers are doing jobs for less money, but Uber is bad because licensed drivers are doing a job for less money. Got it.

Who decides what a ‘fact’ is? And more importantly, since when is Facebook a news organization?

Why is this an issue now when the soon-to-be previous administration hardly ever had any intel briefings on the daily schedule? (double standard?)

I could give a crap about who interprets Santa - race, gender, penguin, whatever. I’m just wondering, for the sake of consistency, since Santa is historically based on Dutch, German, British figures - where is the cultural appropriation outcry? Or is that only a one way street?

So when you use the term ‘nepotism’ - is that similar to, say, a sitting President assigning a first lady the task of creating a government run healthcare system in the ‘90s  (while pushing photos of baking cookies)?

Just curious as to what your breakfast conversation would have been if Hillary Clinton had won the election(?)

Trump - flawed - got it (let’s gloss over the ignorance/naivety/hypocrisy of the ‘I’m With Her’ crowd).