And brail also. Or why stop there, interpretive dance.

TLDR: Don't like? Don't watch...I like, I watch...if something offends me I turn it off...get the idea?

Actually, I do know of a guy who takes photos of women in public and just keeps them (thousands of them) on his computer. Just to have them. His girlfriend found them and was upset, furious, called him on it. He insisted it wasn't a sexual thing. But...it's still an invasion of privacy and I still think it has a…

He said that's why the manager is on them to throw em out. He wants the gym to be a safe place and doesn't want to lose business to creeps and their perversions.

We had certain machines we kept facing either walls or support pillars (like the thigh machines) and it was pretty obvious why. That prevented some of it but between the workout area and the pool someone got kicked out for perving about once a month.

Not in my experience, no.

This is why there is porn, pictures of women nearly naked everywhere and yet...these guys still do this. It tells you something, namely that they do it because they get off on the lack of consent, on the predatory nature of it. That's was really grosses me out.

That's not really what it's about though, it's a medical school. Do you see nurses, doctors, or tech's wearing similar clothes? No... Most of these girls (and guys) spend a lot of their class time in actual medical environments and are expected to look professional. It's not sexist..it's just saying "hey this is a…

really? she doesn't look like it!

i know, right? cuz she isn't even a nigger! wtf white guys, get your racism right

Whatever happened to the word allegedly?

Because all parties involved are terrible people deserving of scorn. They are a living, breathing, soap opera consisting entirely of shitty people.

There are more reasons to dislike someone besides just racism. There are plenty of things to dislike about this slimy woman

I'm sure when your kidnapper of a mother is tagging you on facebook it's hard NOT to look.

It helps explain what a meathead this guy is.

The title of the article and the lede are both about how police didn't act because of misogyny. I'm saying that that argument is false, because regardless of his views they couldn't have acted.

Except that the subject is the police inaction. How is my comment not topical?

"Elliot Rodger and Why Cops Didn't Take the Warning Signs Seriously"

I work in mental health, and based on the videos, this guy IN NO WAY meets the definition of psychotic. Angry, depressed, misogynist? Yes! But he is certainly not out of touch with reality. In addition, it's very difficult to hospitalize a person or force psychiatric medications on a person unless they demonstrate…