Cars are not sound financial investments. They are depreciating assets whether you buy or lease.

This debate was hashed out 6 months or so ago as well. This is clickbait if I ever saw it.

This piece assumes that it's better to take a 5 year loan at 4% than a 3 year lease at 0% and buy it back at the end.

I can't say I'm surprised by the result but I can say that I am glad this match-up happened.

Seamless.

Money is not made in auto journalism by filling your front page with dad-fucker articles.

It's not this, so I don't care.

Very true. Operations and process implementation matter so much more than location of manufacture.

"we've stuck to our roots and have made our 4.0 v6 even better while sacrificing fuel economy and not upping performance. We also received all your letters asking for a small diesel and we have answered. Fuck you"

Awwww man, now asshats get everything.

I still think Stanislav Petrov deserves an international holiday.

You can say that about literally every decently performing or decent-looking car.

You can say that about almost every BMW, no?

The g37 was such a Jalop car that bared too much hate for no reason. It was a RWD Japanese sedan (that was actually manufactured in Japan) with 300+ hp, mechanical power steering, leather as standard, and didn't even require you to pay for navigation if you didn't want or need it. How can anyone hate on that? We need…

Leather air vents on Porsche's

Isn't involuntarily shitting your pants a symptom of pretty significant head trauma associated with concussion-like symptoms? I read an article about how this is a thing football players taking huge hits to their head do (maybe even on deadspin itself). So while we can laugh at him for shitting himself, this may…

Any clean, full-size, fully loaded luxury truck. This one stands out: Lincoln Blackwood.