In fairness we can keep talking about the bathrooms but we should do it from an economic context.
In fairness we can keep talking about the bathrooms but we should do it from an economic context.
Lots of emotion in your take, but where is the logical explanation of how “we’re not going to take it” is an effective strategy for moving the democratic party to the left?
The way to make progress is by taking back control of governor’s mansions and state legislatures across the country.
I read a great article the other day arguing that Hillary’s “theme” for her campaign should have been lifted from her book It Takes a Village.
And sadly his rhetoric that inspires so many of us just doesn’t reach certain homes in america.
I voted for him in the primary but Bernie didn’t stand a chance to win the general election.
The Daily Caller is the best you’ve got?
That’s not remotely the same thing.
Suicide is always an option.
I meant that in reference to passing the flame, not just passing.
On this morning’s show, Scarborough also denounced Conway, though he seems more confused by her continued relevance than angry with her lies.
We need a Half Baked for our time.
What about when a man puts that ultimatum to his wife?
Could be but I’ve personally never had that impression. She has seen first hand how vicious the right was to her mom. I suppose time will tell.
Excellent!
Fair point, but no, that’s not what I mean. What I mean is the lost Kennedy promise of a genuine political dynasty. Trump wants to make good on that with Ivanka, or Jared if he has to settle.
Right but Sarah Palin already modeled that path. She still has rabid fans but I don’t think a majority of people think she resigned gracefully—and her “legacy” will be as the firebrand under qualified VP candidate, not as the governor who resigned and successfully returned to the private sector to effect public change.
In my view, Hillary couldn’t credibly speak to both white workers and BLM/Latinos/Women because the messages are perceived by each side as somewhat antagonistic.
I can see it, but I think it would physically pain Trump to willingly put himself in the category of Nixon. Trump fancies himself a Reagan with a Kennedy future (Ivanka, etc.).
Laws don’t simply exist—they are written by, for, and enforced by individuals based on a collective understanding of limits on property. If this dude wants to move to an unincorporated area, then there won’t be a “town” to bother him about his plane.