Better link:
Better link:
To be fair, it’s more likely a reference to:
So they could steal two seats?
Right? This is a fairly stupid analysis if they didn’t weight the program benefits or the cost of depreciation.
It’s their 2.0 liter turbo four strategy, but for a totally different income bracket. I’m not sure it’s as compelling.
I’m not sure the MLB cars differentiate themselves enough. There’s way too much overlap in engines and trim.
I think Rolls-Royce pulls it off better simply because they’re not beholden to any notion that they have to be “sporty” in the way Bentley is. Often the latter occupies a weird kind of liminal space.
No, these fuckers are morons who make it pretty apparent they routinely bypass this nation’s vast bureaucracy.
Yeah, this looks painful as fuck. Bit weird to see it celebrated like this.
Those taillights... They may as well put the glowing face of Winston Churchill on there.
Obvious solution: quicksand road leading up to the bridge. If you’re too fat for the bridge, you’re too fat for the road. #geenious
A very good point that isn’t made often enough.
This is a good idea. Jaguar kind of sucks right now, and are in desperate need of something to distinguish them. I can’t think of a company better suited for this.