Really? I’d like to say a majority of hatchbacks have a cargo cover connected to the hatch. In my experience, the area is covered by default.
BounceBounce
bouncebounce
Mazda6 Is Always The Answer.
I mean, it looks awful. But I wholly appreciate it.
This Audi looks like other Audis. Quelle horreur.
The explanation is so attenuated it reads like a rationalization for how they once had to scheme to steal Honda sales from particularly inattentive shoppers.
The show also made sure she was there when the handmaids were sharing their names. Pretty clearly something is building there.
Also, dear god this era of Aston Martin was unfortunate looking. It is almost impressive when you consider the original DB9 from which they started.
Which, narratively, should make it all the more implausible that she would delegate that aspect of her subversion.
On a scale of finance bro to finance bro, how finance bro does it make you feel?
Yes, I love that first gen 5 GT. Lines like an old Saab 900.
Those stainless steel skid plates make me lol and reduce me to tears I am so in awe of its majesty.
I understand Ford’s rationale, just questioning (not faulting) the author’s logic.
Ford is doomed, they say. But I don’t share that perspective—no one wanted to buy those cars anyway, and this came down to just being a cold, hard business decision.
That brutalism is almost avant-garde, though, when every other maker prefers (overdone) organic shapes.
“The Aston Martin Vantage Looks Nice As Hell When You Can’t See Most Of It”
Well, this is horrible. But I’m finding their righteous indignation fairly amusing. It’s such a quaint, pre-2016 version of American conservatism. I’m relieved / troubled that they think such a world still exists.
dooo iiiit
It’s a V6, no1curr. They’re welcome to revisit this idea, though:
As head of a subdivision of a major conglomorate that is notoriously bad at differentiation (of product), I’m fairly certain he was stuck working the levers he had.