bottle-of-smoke
Bottle-Of-Smoke
bottle-of-smoke

Nah, OP has a point. He didn’t send the pictures to US, so it’s pretty much the same on our end. The relationship between tyga and the leaker isn’t the same as jlaw’s with the hacker, but our relationship to both photos is essentially identical: voyueristic, nonconsensual.

Except for last summer when he dragged them to a final while Higuain and Aguero took a month-long nap...

Zizou sure, but not Ronaldo. Ronaldo may have had the best peak of any player I’ve ever seen, but his peak was too short.

Messi is undoubtedly the best player of his generation though, and Cristiano is a distant 2nd.

Watching their front three has provided great enjoyment this year, not simply because of their skill of the number of goals. Even in the first half of the season when Suarez wasn’t finding the back of the net as much as he might like, all three of them have looked like 8-year-old best friends crushing kids at the

Damn, Whitlock got put in a vacant.

You’re an idiot. By that same logic you could claim that because Jennifer Lawrence’s private photos were sent through Apple’s servers, her leaked photos did not violate her privacy, just Apple’s. If Sony released them that would be one thing, but they did not, and you’re making a huge jump in your rationalizations.

I am an avid jezebel reader and I have to say, I am totally disgusted that a website devoted to feminist issues would report on this EXTREME invasion of privacy in this way. Beyond that, to comment on and poke fun at a woman’s personal decisions regarding her appearance and personal well being is not only undeniably

This is disgusting. She’s a middle-aged woman trying to look merely decent and do her best in a business that is incredibly hostile to woman who are not 25 and beautiful.

Publishing this is some mean girl bullshit. There’s plenty of room for legit critique of her business practices, but this is totally off the mark. Do better.

A woman somewhere had a good job, and now her private amazon purchases are news for you to make money off of ridiculing her? Forget anti-feminist; you are a ghoul, and you earn a bad living by making the world a worse place for everyone else.

Almost forgot that Jezebel is a feminist site keen on protecting women’s privacy and choices. Oh, wait.

This feels cruel and vaguely misogynistic. How is it not? Shouldn’t we all be allowed the privacy of our genital grooming routines, unless we decide to become public advocates for the steam cleanse?

This is really unnecessary.

Powerful men with anger issues = brilliant.

Wait...you think this is real? And not an agreed on "bit" between Bertinelli and Stonestreet?

"well, almost anyone"

But then why write about your experiences before interviewing the subject of this story/post? It's like you're trying to have it both ways. On the one hand you acknowledge that your story pales in comparison to the other stories of the people who lived the trauma and that you do not feel like you deserve sympathy. But

Are we supposed to feel sympathy for this woman?

-Remember that time I wrote a poorly-worded and confusing email to you that was just a hair under the length of the Infinite Jest?

-I do, ole chap! I had such a silly haircut back then. Welp, let's bury the hatchet and get back to completely ruining the entire fucking world.