I would be more forgiving if he backed up his scientific assertions with actual data or reasoning, rather than “I’m a geologist”.
I would be more forgiving if he backed up his scientific assertions with actual data or reasoning, rather than “I’m a geologist”.
What do you mean, the — oh, let’s not get into this.
No shit. Or, that person could have all their medical pain, and be a little person. Try being in pain AND not being able to reach a kitchen cabinet.
Great but the real discussion here should be Donny’s racist language.
I don’t need the filter of CNN, Faux News, MSNBC, or anything else you can up with to formulate my opinions, I can just get it all straight from the sources themselves.
“There’s an Amendment that mentions guns, so it cancels out all the other parts of the Constitution that guarantee a right to life and liberty.”
Brave would have been promising to refuse NRA money going forward. It was an unbelievably easy thing and he didn’t do that. Any money turned away would have been made up by those applauding his decision. It was one of the more obvious questions that would be asked and he looked completely unprepared to answer it. Or…
Right, but these boxes are not providing produce and fresh meat (at least, the budget does not say that they are). My main point being: there are so many questions they clearly did not consider, they just slapped it into the budget.
“SNAP is not supposed to be enjoyable, it is supposed to be something temporary to help people survive until they can provide for themselves.”
Food choice is very often a necessity. People have allergies, diseases, different nutritional needs, not to mention religious followings, that dictate what they can and can’t eat. Many people on food stamps have also paid taxes. It’s not “taking from the public,” it’s what we all put in so we can benefit if a need…
Is it though, at it’s center? As a legal aid attorney who works with welfare recipients, I see two problems with SNAP.
Included in the Trump Administration’s Fiscal Year 2019 budget proposal is a “bold new approach” to the Supplemental…
It’s like watching Darth Vader remove his mask.
Republican in the front, skinhead in the back.
And then my husband saved the day.
The person who said it was one of the few in the political arena in recent years I felt had any sense of integrity. Michelle Obama is one of the very few who could ever say it without making me roll my eyes.
Oh, come on. You know that if she didn’t respond, people would’ve written op-eds being like, “Why hasn’t Hillary responded? Does she endorse sexual harassment?” Everything Hillary Clinton does and does not do is news and has been since at least 1992.
Can we stop with the Clinton shit. She is no longer news. She is not the president. She is not actively destroying our country. She is a flawed person who has made a fair amount of stupid decisions in her life. She has also been attacked relentlessly for her mistakes. And also for everything else she has ever done. It…
Yes, it would have been better.
I saw the statement in Facebook right after it was posted, didn’t even think about the SOTU. I liked the statement, I understood her reasoning and her regret. She makes no bones about the fact that hindsight is 20/20, in fact she devoted one of many paragraphs to that idea.