This sort of gets right at the heart of the issue - people are so prone to outrage that even pointing out a fact gets construed as a defense. This, in turn, helps perpetuate falsehoods and outrage, as people like you are afraid to even chime into the conversation for fear of being labeled “defenders.”

The virtue signaling in the comments of Kinja sites has become unbearable. There’s a valid argument to be had here, but it gets shut down by lazy ass comments like this one. You’re “perfectly happy” conflating two different things? Awesome contribution to the discussion.

toilets don’t actually do that - it’s a myth.

He has a lot of makeup on his face so needs to make sure just his lips are touching the edge of the bottle, so as not to smear anything.

lol you think it’s because Mormons are good secret keepers rather than, say, there being a lot of cheap ass land and an educated workforce?

“I am as concern about him as you are,”

You are the reason why this site churns out crap rather than anything of value. Trump is, for the most part, indefensible, but this piece just invented something to peg a generic anti-Trump rant to. As long as folks like you are “delighted” by the laziest, “look at this big orange carrot baby small hands golfer”…

They should definitely have had a satphone - not the smartest folks.

Based on this comment I would of guessed that grammar funding got cut in your school district.

This is a whole lot of weird projection.

How do you plan to pay for college or any other major future expenses like that?

Is this meant to imply that a family of 4 making $87k/year total in 2017 is doing pretty well?

It’s possible that she was being a bitch and that he is an insecure loser.

Uh because playing D1 NCAA ball means they will be a massive star, rather than a nobody in a Euro league. How is this even a question?

Only a Pats fan could make this article somehow about his personal 9/11 experience

wow cool dreams

Why do you have such a weird boner for curtailing rights? Obviously it is subjective - you subjectively decided on criteria by which a person’s rights can be curtailed, based solely on their ideology.

Yes, inserting Jezebel commenter Sobchak Security’s subjective free speech standard into our system of inalienable rights sounds really easy.

It’s the definition of a slippery slope to argue that those you don’t agree with “get no rights.” They already do not have a right to physically harm anyone, and they certainly don’t have a right to be free from the consequences of their opinions/actions. However, all Americans do indeed have the right to “be an…

Self assureD - what is this trend of people dropping the D off the end of words? Mind boggling.