borkborkborkbork69
borkborkborkbork69
borkborkborkbork69

brad pitt is about 30 years too old to play Vietnam era john teller, who would have been about 19-23 years old. maybe grampa teller or something.
also, he is not 6'7 or so, which JT supposedly was based on the framed mug sshots from the club house.

not butt hurt, just have no reason to support them or feel sorry for them. they are cheaters. cheaters suck.

so what are they bitching about? they won when they cheated and didn't win when they didn't because they got caught. screw them.

finding a loophole (6 wheels in a class that doesn't specify wheel count, ground effects in a class with no rules against it) is not the same as cheating (articulated, spring loaded wing elements in a class with a specific rule against movable aerodynamic devices)

no sympathy for cheaters. if they put as much effort into designing a good car within the rules as they spend engineering moving/flexing wings they might have won a race by now.

where is my “this author is an idiot” button.
seriously ma’te’ or whetever the hell your name is.
they got a 3 million investment from the government to try to develop something cool. 3 million. that is the equivalent cost to 3 miles of 2 lane road. that is the running cost for about 10 software engineers for a year.
go

seriously, only $3Million? to potentially revolutionize cars? and you are bitching about it? how about $1 TRILLION for the fucking useless F-35?

dammit, now I need new underwear.

I owned a ‘76ish coupe TR7 with a pep-boys sunroof when I was 19.
I loved the hell out of that car, handled great, had enough power.
I loved it so much I ran it into an embankment one rainy night in late fall due to excess speed, wet leaves and a descending off camber turn.

<patent prior art>
something I would like to see addressed is the compromise of the flywheel mass which is needed to balance drivability (heavy flywheel) and responsiveness (light flywheel)

I currently drive a manual Honda Fit which has both no power and no flywheel. great throttle response once you are moving, but no

slap a couple turbo-generators on the exhaust and an electric motor on the supercharger and a battery/supercapaciter would do the job.

why does it look like an angry catfish?
do you instantaneously become as boring as the car when you drive it?
is it available in hybrid?

needs 8-bit black sunglasses dropping down from the sky onto his face and "like a boss" in 8-bit bold black letters

and this was 5 min after takeoff, at a normal 1000 FPM altitude gain they would be at about 5000 feet, so effectively 0 pressure differential inside to outside

no it isn't because they pressurize to 5000 feet. up to 10,000 feet the internal/external pressure ratio is very small. not enough to blow a hole like that.

and yet he is still a better driver than you can ever dream of being.

I dug into his stats regarding mechanical vs crash related retirements and Pastor’s retirement rate is actually by far mostly down to driving shit cars that break down. yes he’s crashed more than many of his peers, but less than others too.

ugh, you are wrong. ‘64-66 and ‘70-71 are the only ‘Cudas.
67-69 is just lame looking.

generally a Ford guy, but I would sell body parts for a 64-66 cuda

we call the Stealerships for a reason. do not expect ethical behavior from a car dealership.

what in my post gave you the impression that I thought we ever would? did you not read it?

freevalve type technology will continue to have a place as we are unlikely to get to a place where all vehicles are all electric