Hmm, still couldn’t quote it, I see.

A) Then it should be super easy for you to quote.

A) Quote me saying millionaires can’t be in a labour dispute with management.

A) “You made a strawman argument that I and others were arguing on behalf of the wealthy out of principle. We were arguing on behalf of labor out of principle, no matter the total wealth they had.”

A) You don’t know what a strawman argument is.

lol, another kid trying the false-binary fallacy.

I need to bring the argument back on track after people try to use strawman/false-binary fallacies.

I remember Scott Aukerman praising that joke but I think he miscreditted it to Steve Martin.

So this movie is not as funny as Borat, but its satire is sharper, it’s ability to craft a narrative is stronger, and at some points, it oddly sweeter than the original.

It’s weird that you equate responding to you as dying on a hill.

Me: Nobody looks good in this story.

Disrespect in this case being “I’m super rich and entitled to free stuff and they wouldn’t give it to me!”

I think you would certainly mock an Eli Manning f he changed teams over $209.

Who is forcing you to choose a side?

“Never fails to crack me up when people side with billionaires over millionaires.”

“I think it’s less “super rich and entitled to free stuff” and more “created shows that put ABC at the top of the ratings and made Disney an estimated $2 billion and feels entitled to a free Disney product in return”.”

Nobody looks good in this story. Disney should have just given her another pass, but also, the super rich shouldn’t feel entitled to free stuff.

Because it doesn’t make money and then you get that VOD money later, anyway.

extremely

It’s really not all that unprofessional.