bootsyp
BootsyP
bootsyp

That’s simplistic. In that situation, you’d still have to investigate other possibilities. Two examples:

“It took them a half an hour to find his not dead wife, confirm it was his not dead wife, and let him go?”

If black people spent as much time thinking about science as Michael Harriot spends thinking about cookouts, we’d have discovered a cure for cancer, the origins of the universe, and a method for time travel. Seriously, that guy is obsessed with cookouts...especially with making sure that white people don’t attend them.

“I think plenty of other people gave you detailed proof already.”

Maybe. Let’s wait until we have the facts.

Ok, kids, let’s not get carried away.

Oops. I just noticed a typo that changed the meaning of a sentence. It should’ve read, “Don’t you think they’d rather see their country improve THAN have to start over in a new place and deal with a language barrier and cultural differences.”

“So really, what are the options?”

Thanks for that detailed proof of how I’m wrong. You’ve converted me with your substantive rebuttal. I’m on your side now.

That’s not the right guy, dumbass. The article is about a guy from Pittsburgh. That Facebook page belongs to a younger guy from Philadelphia with the same name. You better hope nobody targets the guy you misidentified. You’re setting yourself up for a lawsuit. This is why you don’t try to doxx people. Too bad you

The cop did everything right. The driver was entirely at fault. If you don’t understand that, then you don’t understand the country in which you live; you don’t understand what behavior is expected of you as a citizen; you are so far removed from the mainstream that it’s amazing you manage to function at all. If you

No, the cop was professional even after the guy went for the gear shift. There was nothing wrong with his behavior when things escalated. His was an appropriate response.

Yeah...this isn’t really a thing. It’s just another case of what we (incorrectly) imagine white people do. Just more anti-white nonsense from the Root.

“It’s worst than what you described. Republican and long-time conservative David Brooks is warning Democrats that if they don’t nominate a Republican or someone Republicans feel they can tolerate then, what? They won’t vote for the party they already weren’t going to vote for?”

That’s a mischaracterization of his piece, and you know it. No moderate is coming out against “treating people with dignity” or “making sure we care for those who can’t care for themselves.” They’re coming out against policies that they think are going to cost their party the election. They’re coming out against

“Let me guess. The gist of Brooks’ article is that people wanting and therefor electing progressives to represent them is somehow going to drive away the fickle, magical unicorn that is the white, undecided voter.”

I always hated the comparisons to Chappelle’s Show. They were sketch comedies with black people on Comedy Central—that’s about all they had in common. Chappelle’s Show had one or two great sketches, a few good ones, and a bunch of mediocre ones. The sketches often were predictable and offered shallow, lazy social

No.

Compelling rebuttal. You made a convert out of me.

You don’t know what “moving the goalposts” means. That was not a correct use of the expression.