The bombing of Libya was an act of self-defense? That’s absurd.
The bombing of Libya was an act of self-defense? That’s absurd.
Really? What’s so complicated about attacking whistle blowers after he promised to protect them? What’s so complicated about the disaster that is Libya? What about the expansion of the surveillance state? Some Democrats are unable to criticize Obama and it’s just sad.
It is so sad to watch “the left” defend a brutal American foreign policy that has killed millions of people.
I had the same experience as a Sanders supporter whenever I tried to talk to Clinton voters.
Obama did not prosecute torturers when he came to office.
I think it’s a better idea to look at Clinton’s record rather than her campaign rhetoric to best understand what kind of President she would have been.
That is not my argument.
You’re not adding to this discussion. Go away.
Remember when Obama said he would end NAFTA and Democrats believed him? One example of many.
Democrats love to blame Republicans for all of Obama’s faults.
Hillary Clinton has supported several wars that have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people. You can use all the excuses and justifications you like but your side is not as pure as you would like to think.
Are Hillary Clinton voters tolerant of bombing innocent people?
Should Clinton’s trail of destriction be a deal-breaker?
The problem I have with this view is that it works from the premise that Hillary Clinton is a wonderful person.
Obama promised hope and change in 2008 and a lot of these people voted for that. Obama didn’t bring much hope and change once in office so these people decided to vote for the next person who promised it. It was a more appealing message than “everything is fine and if you don’t agree with that you are a racist and a…
Did Clinton voters signal they are okay with bombing innocent people?
It is a lot easier to dismiss all Trump voters as racist than it is to try and understand the perspective of others.
I understand this won’t be a popular opinion, but why should John Lewis be protected from criticism? Trump’s response to him was classless, but Lewis made a bombshell accusation (that Trump is not a legitimate president) that he didn’t back up very well.
It is counterproductive to ban stuff you don’t like.
Free speech is for fascists.