players don’t have to play for the team that drafted them. if they sit out the year they are re-inserted into the draft.
players don’t have to play for the team that drafted them. if they sit out the year they are re-inserted into the draft.
3 years?!?!
But is it really a lie if you believe it?
impeach him and do what? watch the senate not remove him from office?
She’s like the Jackie Robinson of American politics right now. Not merely qualified, but operating on a whole other level.
i’m pretty sure there is a drill they do that involves actually aiming at the upright. so there is probably some statistical data held by each team
Sports are awesome!
?!?
last i checked, paying a 55 year old 1.25 Mil for being on the team almost 2 decades ago isn’t a smart business model. but what do i know, i’m not a billionaire
imo they’re taking the side of the team, not the billionaire owner. the specific owner isn’t important. for example, look at the Skins: most fans know Dan Snyder is human trash and their fans tend to not like him, but they root for the team
i love the economical fallacy that players salaries are the reason for ridiculous ticket prices.
lets not forget, while talking about salaries and payroll, that Bobby Bonilla (55) and Brett Saberghagen (55) are both on the player payroll of the same franchise.
ftfy
Hopefully that was the Last Responder Bowl
people have to start throwing this back at them. ask the jackass what apartment he lives in. just like with asking his name - he wont want to give out that information, which is the out anyone needs - if you’re not going to give me your name and address, why should i give you mine?
flipping 300k worth of sneakers?!?!
why does a woman have to build up another woman? her opinion is the song sucks and has (probably) nothing to do with the gender of the person singing it.
and again, even if the Feds gave 5B to Flint, no where else, 5B isn’t doing anywhere near what the OP think it’s doing. that is the point of my comment. everyone who isn’t in the business of infrastructure thinks designing and building infrastructure is way cheaper than it really is.
my point was not about what is a better use of money (obv a wall is a huge waste of money). my point was that the OP seems to think that 5B is going to create tons and tons of infrastructure, which it will not.
my point was not about what is a better use of money (obv a wall is a huge waste of money). my point was that the OP seems to think that 5B is going to create tons and tons of infrastructure, which it will not.